PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCVLX vs. FAIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCVLX vs. FAIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuance Concentrated Value Fund (NCVLX) and Fairholme Fund (FAIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCVLX achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly lower than FAIRX's 7.44% return. Over the past 10 years, NCVLX has underperformed FAIRX with an annualized return of 6.85%, while FAIRX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.48% annualized return.


NCVLX

1D
-0.46%
1M
3.04%
YTD
3.29%
6M
3.84%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
6.85%

FAIRX

1D
1.11%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
7.44%
6M
4.70%
1Y
36.41%
3Y*
13.20%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
9.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCVLX vs. FAIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NCVLX
Nuance Concentrated Value Fund
3.29%3.28%6.02%10.00%-5.02%9.86%3.08%27.77%-4.76%11.07%
FAIRX
Fairholme Fund
7.44%29.49%-17.44%46.72%-20.49%6.87%47.76%32.06%-23.18%-5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between NCVLX and FAIRX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2011

0.59

The correlation between NCVLX and FAIRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCVLX vs. FAIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCVLX
NCVLX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
NCVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
NCVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

FAIRX
FAIRX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FAIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FAIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCVLX vs. FAIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuance Concentrated Value Fund (NCVLX) and Fairholme Fund (FAIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCVLXFAIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.27

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

2.65

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.22

7.67

-5.45

NCVLX vs. FAIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCVLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the FAIRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCVLX and FAIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCVLXFAIRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

1.47

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.25

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.40

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.46

+0.09

Drawdowns

NCVLX vs. FAIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCVLX drawdown since its inception was -31.48%, smaller than the maximum FAIRX drawdown of -51.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCVLX and FAIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCVLXFAIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.48%

-51.28%

+19.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-13.96%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.58%

-27.95%

+8.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.58%

-41.50%

+21.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.48%

-41.50%

+10.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.67%

-9.55%

+1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-11.59%

+7.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

4.81%

-0.11%

Volatility

NCVLX vs. FAIRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuance Concentrated Value Fund (NCVLX) is 4.11%, while Fairholme Fund (FAIRX) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that NCVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCVLXFAIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

4.48%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

17.72%

-8.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.45%

25.06%

-12.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.87%

26.34%

-12.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.10%

24.06%

-8.96%

NCVLX vs. FAIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCVLX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FAIRX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCVLX vs. FAIRX - Dividend Comparison

NCVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than FAIRX's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAIRX
Fairholme Fund
0.54%0.58%0.71%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.57%0.83%2.23%1.29%7.29%69.79%
NCVLX
Nuance Concentrated Value Fund
1.69%2.38%7.34%1.81%13.64%17.21%0.64%7.97%13.45%7.02%0.96%5.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCVLX and FAIRX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAIRX has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to NCVLX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCVLX dropped -31.48% vs FAIRX's -51.28%.

FAIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCVLX and FAIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer