NCVLX vs. FGINX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

NCVLX (Nuance Concentrated Value Fund) and FGINX (Delaware Growth and Income Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NCVLX returned 6.86%/yr vs 13.25%/yr for FGINX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NCVLX charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FGINX.

Performance

NCVLX vs. FGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuance Concentrated Value Fund (NCVLX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCVLX achieves a 3.45% return, which is significantly lower than FGINX's 16.83% return. Over the past 10 years, NCVLX has underperformed FGINX with an annualized return of 6.86%, while FGINX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.25% annualized return.

NCVLX

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 3.12%
• YTD: 3.45%
• 6M: 4.76%
• 1Y: 11.44%
• 3Y*: 5.16%
• 5Y*: 3.42%
• 10Y*: 6.86%

FGINX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 5.99%
• YTD: 16.83%
• 6M: 22.29%
• 1Y: 43.75%
• 3Y*: 26.05%
• 5Y*: 16.12%
• 10Y*: 13.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCVLX vs. FGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NCVLX Nuance Concentrated Value Fund	3.45%	3.28%	6.02%	10.00%	-5.02%	9.86%	3.08%	27.77%	-4.76%	11.07%
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund	16.83%	29.78%	15.13%	11.98%	3.03%	21.37%	-0.08%	25.64%	-10.27%	18.08%

Correlation

The correlation between NCVLX and FGINX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2011	0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between NCVLX and FGINX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

NCVLX vs. FGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCVLX

NCVLX Risk / Return Rank: 10
NCVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
NCVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
NCVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
NCVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
NCVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

FGINX

FGINX Risk / Return Rank: 96
FGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCVLX vs. FGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuance Concentrated Value Fund (NCVLX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NCVLX	FGINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	3.93	-3.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	5.42	-4.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.71	-0.55
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.93	6.13	-5.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.30	23.50	-21.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NCVLX vs. FGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCVLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the FGINX Sharpe Ratio of 3.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCVLX and FGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NCVLX	FGINX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	3.93	-3.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	1.09	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.78	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.55	+0.01

Drawdowns

NCVLX vs. FGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCVLX drawdown since its inception was -31.48%, smaller than the maximum FGINX drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCVLX and FGINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCVLX	FGINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.48%	-54.80%	+23.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.54%	-7.34%	-4.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.58%	-13.28%	-6.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.58%	-16.21%	-3.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.48%	-37.37%	+5.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.53%	0.00%	-7.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.07%	-9.70%	+5.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.65%	1.91%	+2.74%

Volatility

NCVLX vs. FGINX - Volatility Comparison

Nuance Concentrated Value Fund (NCVLX) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) at 2.74%. This indicates that NCVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCVLX	FGINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.56%	2.74%	+1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.14%	8.20%	+0.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	11.36%	+1.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.87%	14.88%	-1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.10%	17.03%	-1.93%

NCVLX vs. FGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCVLX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FGINX's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

NCVLX vs. FGINX - Dividend Comparison

NCVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than FGINX's 9.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund	9.73%	11.28%	12.40%	7.11%	7.04%	11.97%	6.59%	51.75%	25.36%	5.13%	4.12%	5.66%
NCVLX Nuance Concentrated Value Fund	1.69%	2.38%	7.34%	1.81%	13.64%	17.21%	0.64%	7.97%	13.45%	7.02%	0.96%	5.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NCVLX and FGINX in my portfolio?

NCVLX and FGINX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NCVLX or FGINX?

NCVLX has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to FGINX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCVLX dropped -31.48% vs FGINX's -54.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.93 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.