PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCV vs. PXSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCV vs. PXSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Convertible and Income Fund (NCV) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCV achieves a 19.63% return, which is significantly higher than PXSGX's -9.83% return. Over the past 10 years, NCV has underperformed PXSGX with an annualized return of 8.29%, while PXSGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.83% annualized return.


NCV

1D
0.46%
1M
3.22%
YTD
19.63%
6M
18.43%
1Y
42.41%
3Y*
23.12%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
8.29%

PXSGX

1D
-1.45%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
-9.83%
6M
-10.79%
1Y
-24.86%
3Y*
-2.19%
5Y*
-5.38%
10Y*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCV vs. PXSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NCV
Virtus Convertible and Income Fund
19.63%22.57%16.18%12.66%-34.02%10.68%11.64%24.12%-17.25%23.24%
PXSGX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund
-9.83%-22.97%21.11%20.27%-30.04%4.47%43.46%40.26%9.05%36.99%

Correlation

The correlation between NCV and PXSGX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2006

0.50

The correlation between NCV and PXSGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCV vs. PXSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCV
NCV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PXSGX
PXSGX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
PXSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
PXSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCV vs. PXSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Convertible and Income Fund (NCV) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCVPXSGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

0.80

+0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

-0.87

+4.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.16

-1.54

+16.70

NCV vs. PXSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is higher than the PXSGX Sharpe Ratio of -1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCV and PXSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCVPXSGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

-1.33

+4.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

-0.22

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.44

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.40

-0.16

Drawdowns

NCV vs. PXSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCV drawdown since its inception was -78.94%, which is greater than PXSGX's maximum drawdown of -53.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCV and PXSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCVPXSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.94%

-53.72%

-25.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

-28.37%

+16.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.80%

-42.49%

+24.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.60%

-42.49%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.18%

-42.49%

-13.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-40.51%

+39.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.89%

-11.76%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

15.92%

-13.12%

Volatility

NCV vs. PXSGX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Convertible and Income Fund (NCV) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) have volatilities of 5.54% and 5.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCVPXSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

5.56%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

13.18%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.07%

18.57%

-3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.59%

24.78%

-4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.86%

22.58%

+2.28%

NCV vs. PXSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PXSGX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCV vs. PXSGX - Dividend Comparison

NCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.39%, less than PXSGX's 53.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NCV
Virtus Convertible and Income Fund
9.39%10.77%11.76%12.86%15.00%8.75%9.41%11.61%15.03%11.10%12.23%17.69%
PXSGX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund
53.13%47.91%20.72%5.31%17.32%14.31%9.64%1.52%2.31%0.00%2.69%2.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCV and PXSGX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXSGX has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to NCV (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCV dropped -78.94% vs PXSGX's -53.72%.

NCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs -1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCV and PXSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer