PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCRLX vs. NBGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCRLX vs. NBGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund (NCRLX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCRLX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than NBGIX's 6.58% return. Over the past 10 years, NCRLX has underperformed NBGIX with an annualized return of 1.86%, while NBGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.17% annualized return.


NCRLX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.59%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.30%
1Y
5.48%
3Y*
4.22%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
1.86%

NBGIX

1D
0.56%
1M
0.47%
YTD
6.58%
6M
4.25%
1Y
7.57%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCRLX vs. NBGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NCRLX
Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund
0.50%7.24%1.90%5.69%-14.36%-1.07%9.50%9.43%-1.06%3.95%
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
6.58%-4.55%9.20%15.73%-19.35%18.25%25.07%29.68%-6.76%16.02%

Correlation

The correlation between NCRLX and NBGIX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1999

-0.10

The correlation between NCRLX and NBGIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCRLX vs. NBGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCRLX
NCRLX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
NCRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
NCRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

NBGIX
NBGIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
NBGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCRLX vs. NBGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund (NCRLX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCRLXNBGIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

0.57

+0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.05

0.97

+1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.11

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

0.86

+1.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.64

2.30

+3.33

NCRLX vs. NBGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCRLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the NBGIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCRLX and NBGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCRLXNBGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

0.57

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.14

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.46

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.54

-0.05

Drawdowns

NCRLX vs. NBGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCRLX drawdown since its inception was -19.21%, smaller than the maximum NBGIX drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCRLX and NBGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCRLXNBGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.21%

-51.62%

+32.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-10.75%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.39%

-27.48%

+21.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.21%

-28.27%

+9.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.21%

-34.53%

+15.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-9.08%

+7.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-7.47%

+3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

3.98%

-3.00%

Volatility

NCRLX vs. NBGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund (NCRLX) is 1.41%, while Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that NCRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCRLXNBGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

4.06%

-2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

11.31%

-8.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

16.04%

-11.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.03%

19.66%

-13.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

20.23%

-15.23%

NCRLX vs. NBGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCRLX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than NBGIX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCRLX vs. NBGIX - Dividend Comparison

NCRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, less than NBGIX's 15.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
15.40%16.41%2.14%3.13%11.11%10.91%3.87%6.00%12.49%14.10%6.53%11.28%
NCRLX
Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund
4.69%4.68%4.76%3.90%2.63%2.47%4.76%3.37%3.00%2.80%3.37%3.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCRLX and NBGIX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBGIX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to NCRLX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCRLX dropped -19.21% vs NBGIX's -51.62%.

NCRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCRLX and NBGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer