PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCPB vs. FTRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCPB vs. FTRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) and Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCPB achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than FTRB's 0.07% return.


NCPB

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.41%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.53%
1Y
6.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTRB

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.07%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
5.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCPB vs. FTRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NCPB
Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF
0.47%7.69%3.55%
FTRB
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF
0.07%7.60%2.54%

Correlation

The correlation between NCPB and FTRB is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.83

The correlation between NCPB and FTRB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCPB vs. FTRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCPB
NCPB Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
NCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
NCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FTRB
FTRB Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCPB vs. FTRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) and Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCPBFTRBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.28

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

1.98

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.87

6.22

+0.65

NCPB vs. FTRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the FTRB Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCPB and FTRB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCPBFTRBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

1.54

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.93

+0.28

Drawdowns

NCPB vs. FTRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCPB drawdown since its inception was -3.59%, smaller than the maximum FTRB drawdown of -4.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCPB and FTRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCPBFTRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.59%

-4.83%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

-2.80%

-0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-1.58%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

-1.29%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.89%

+0.01%

Volatility

NCPB vs. FTRB - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) and Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB) have volatilities of 1.25% and 1.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCPBFTRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

1.31%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.63%

2.62%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.55%

3.59%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.34%

4.56%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.34%

4.56%

-0.22%

NCPB vs. FTRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCPB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FTRB's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCPB vs. FTRB - Dividend Comparison

NCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than FTRB's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FTRB
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF
4.30%4.46%4.40%
NCPB
Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF
5.22%5.21%5.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCPB and FTRB have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTRB has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to NCPB (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCPB dropped -3.59% vs FTRB's -4.83%.

On 1-year performance, NCPB leads with 6.20% vs 5.52% for FTRB. On fees, NCPB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NCPB has performed better with a 6.20% return vs 5.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NCPB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FTRB.

NCPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.22%, compared with 4.30% for FTRB.

They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Federated. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NCPB and 0.39% for FTRB.

NCPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCPB and FTRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer