NCLR.L vs. UX
NCLR.L (WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF) and UX (Roundhill Uranium ETF) are both Uranium funds. NCLR.L is passively managed, while UX is actively managed. Over the past year, NCLR.L returned 42.46% vs 1.24% for UX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NCLR.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UX.
Performance
NCLR.L vs. UX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NCLR.L is traded in GBp, while UX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCLR.L achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly higher than UX's -5.49% return.
NCLR.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -9.19%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- 1Y
- 42.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -6.10%
- YTD
- -5.49%
- 6M
- -5.67%
- 1Y
- 1.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NCLR.L vs. UX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NCLR.L WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF | 7.60% | 112.38% |
UX Roundhill Uranium ETF | -5.49% | 29.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between NCLR.L and UX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NCLR.L vs. UX — Risk / Return Rank
NCLR.L
UX
NCLR.L vs. UX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF (NCLR.L) and Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NCLR.L | UX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.03 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 0.06 | +1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.34 | 0.11 | +3.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NCLR.L vs. UX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCLR.L drawdown since its inception was -28.53%, which is greater than UX's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLR.L and UX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCLR.L | UX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.53% | -24.40% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.53% | -22.49% | -6.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.38% | -21.65% | -1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.75% | -10.80% | +2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.67% | 11.63% | +1.04% |
Volatility
NCLR.L vs. UX - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF (NCLR.L) has a higher volatility of 12.60% compared to Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) at 7.49%. This indicates that NCLR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NCLR.L | UX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.60% | 7.49% | +5.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.26% | 23.50% | +10.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.76% | 33.62% | +13.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.01% | 35.23% | +11.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.01% | 35.23% | +11.78% |
NCLR.L vs. UX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCLR.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than UX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NCLR.L vs. UX - Dividend Comparison
NCLR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NCLR.L WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UX Roundhill Uranium ETF | 1.60% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NCLR.L and UX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NCLR.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NCLR.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UX.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for NCLR.L and 0.75% for UX.
Find the right allocation for NCLR.L and UX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer