PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCLP.L vs. URNG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NCLP.L vs. URNG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NCLP.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (URNG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NCLP.L vs. URNG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

NCLP.L is traded in GBp, while URNG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the URNG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCLP.L achieves a 23.58% return, which is significantly higher than URNG.L's 19.62% return.


NCLP.L

1D
6.16%
1M
-10.37%
YTD
23.58%
6M
19.08%
1Y
153.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

URNG.L

1D
6.87%
1M
-8.64%
YTD
19.62%
6M
8.71%
1Y
128.03%
3Y*
39.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NCLP.L vs. URNG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCLP.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than URNG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NCLP.L vs. URNG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCLP.L
NCLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NCLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
NCLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

URNG.L
URNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
URNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
URNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCLP.L vs. URNG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NCLP.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (URNG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCLP.LURNG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.27

2.61

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.57

3.09

+0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.38

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.74

3.99

+1.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.52

10.85

+5.66

NCLP.L vs. URNG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.27, which is comparable to the URNG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCLP.L and URNG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCLP.LURNG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.27

2.61

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.80

0.56

+2.24

Correlation

The correlation between NCLP.L and URNG.L is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NCLP.L vs. URNG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NCLP.L nor URNG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NCLP.L vs. URNG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCLP.L drawdown since its inception was -26.96%, smaller than the maximum URNG.L drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLP.L and URNG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NCLP.LURNG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.96%

-38.98%

+12.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.96%

-32.59%

+5.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.37%

-12.92%

+2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.10%

-12.93%

+5.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.37%

11.98%

-2.61%

Volatility

NCLP.L vs. URNG.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NCLP.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (URNG.L) have volatilities of 13.50% and 13.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NCLP.LURNG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.50%

13.69%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.32%

38.52%

-2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.47%

48.79%

-2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.10%

39.23%

+6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.10%

39.23%

+6.87%