NCLEX vs. CWSGX
NCLEX (Nicholas Limited Edition Fund) and CWSGX (Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, NCLEX returned -1.65%/yr vs 12.66%/yr for CWSGX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NCLEX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for CWSGX.
Performance
NCLEX vs. CWSGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCLEX achieves a -7.51% return, which is significantly lower than CWSGX's 35.95% return.
NCLEX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- -7.51%
- 6M
- -9.33%
- 1Y
- -12.00%
- 3Y*
- 0.15%
- 5Y*
- -1.65%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
CWSGX
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 9.38%
- YTD
- 35.95%
- 6M
- 33.64%
- 1Y
- 63.38%
- 3Y*
- 32.88%
- 5Y*
- 12.66%
- 10Y*
- —
NCLEX vs. CWSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCLEX Nicholas Limited Edition Fund | -7.51% | -10.41% | 11.91% | 17.17% | -23.71% | 19.07% | 22.67% | 27.36% | -0.94% | 8.15% |
CWSGX Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund | 35.95% | 14.77% | 35.94% | 22.41% | -30.85% | 15.83% | 42.56% | 27.38% | -8.37% | 11.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between NCLEX and CWSGX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017 | 0.86 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NCLEX and CWSGX has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NCLEX vs. CWSGX — Risk / Return Rank
NCLEX
CWSGX
NCLEX vs. CWSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX) and Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NCLEX | CWSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.44 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 5.48 | -5.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 21.79 | -22.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NCLEX vs. CWSGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCLEX drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, which is greater than CWSGX's maximum drawdown of -37.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLEX and CWSGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCLEX | CWSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.68% | -37.29% | -11.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.36% | -11.97% | -9.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.50% | -27.80% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.50% | -37.29% | +8.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.62% | 0.00% | -22.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -11.15% | +2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.72% | 3.01% | +7.71% |
Volatility
NCLEX vs. CWSGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX) is 4.54%, while Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) has a volatility of 8.74%. This indicates that NCLEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NCLEX | CWSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 8.74% | -4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 18.91% | -6.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.04% | 24.09% | -7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 24.37% | -4.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 24.22% | -4.99% |
NCLEX vs. CWSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCLEX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CWSGX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
NCLEX vs. CWSGX - Dividend Comparison
NCLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, more than CWSGX's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWSGX Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.64% | 0.87% | 6.44% | 0.00% | 4.78% | 21.74% | 6.70% | 0.03% | 0.45% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NCLEX Nicholas Limited Edition Fund | 8.15% | 7.53% | 2.51% | 2.43% | 6.22% | 16.44% | 5.10% | 5.66% | 10.72% | 7.97% | 10.68% | 8.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NCLEX and CWSGX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWSGX has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to NCLEX (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCLEX dropped -48.68% vs CWSGX's -37.29%.
CWSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NCLEX and CWSGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer