NCLEX vs. CMCIX
NCLEX (Nicholas Limited Edition Fund) and CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, NCLEX returned -6.44% vs 2.35% for CMCIX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NCLEX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CMCIX.
Performance
NCLEX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCLEX achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly lower than CMCIX's 7.94% return.
NCLEX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 5.82%
- 6M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 1Y
- -6.44%
- 3Y*
- 1.20%
- 5Y*
- -0.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.62%
CMCIX
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NCLEX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NCLEX Nicholas Limited Edition Fund | -0.91% | -10.41% | 11.91% | 6.19% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 7.94% | -5.28% | 10.46% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between NCLEX and CMCIX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023 | 0.87 |
The correlation between NCLEX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NCLEX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
NCLEX
CMCIX
NCLEX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NCLEX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.03 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 0.13 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | 0.30 | -1.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NCLEX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCLEX drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLEX and CMCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCLEX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.68% | -21.50% | -27.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.88% | -11.68% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.10% | -5.33% | -11.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.31% | -6.45% | -1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.59% | 5.05% | +5.54% |
Volatility
NCLEX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison
Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 4.42%. This indicates that NCLEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NCLEX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 4.42% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 10.94% | +1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.20% | 15.37% | +1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.60% | 16.47% | +3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 16.47% | +2.72% |
NCLEX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCLEX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
NCLEX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison
NCLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, more than CMCIX's 3.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 3.94% | 4.25% | 7.13% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NCLEX Nicholas Limited Edition Fund | 7.60% | 7.53% | 2.51% | 2.43% | 6.22% | 16.44% | 5.10% | 5.66% | 10.72% | 7.97% | 10.68% | 8.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NCLEX and CMCIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NCLEX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to CMCIX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCLEX dropped -48.68% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.
CMCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NCLEX and CMCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer