PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCIRX vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCIRX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio (NCIRX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCIRX achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than WFSPX's 9.34% return.


NCIRX

1D
0.13%
1M
-1.15%
6M
-0.26%
YTD
0.02%
1Y
2.85%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
-0.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-11.08%

WFSPX

1D
1.66%
1M
-0.56%
6M
7.78%
YTD
9.34%
1Y
20.57%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
12.65%
10Y*
14.88%
ALL TIME*
16.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NCIRX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NCIRX
Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio
0.02%7.94%2.33%6.33%-17.36%-0.80%-49.00%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
9.34%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%19.41%

Correlation

The correlation between NCIRX and WFSPX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020

0.13

The correlation between NCIRX and WFSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCIRX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NCIRX
NCIRX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NCIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NCIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NCIRX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio (NCIRX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NCIRXWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.26

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

2.06

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.89

8.83

-4.93

NCIRX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCIRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCIRX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NCIRX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCIRX drawdown since its inception was -60.34%, roughly equal to the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCIRX and WFSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCIRXWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.34%

-58.21%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-8.90%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.48%

-18.74%

+13.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.88%

-24.51%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.89%

-2.10%

-48.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.39%

-12.72%

-40.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

2.07%

-0.99%

Volatility

NCIRX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio (NCIRX) is 0.91%, while iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that NCIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCIRXWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

3.44%

-2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

10.09%

-7.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

12.85%

-9.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.75%

16.99%

-10.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

18.03%

+3.28%

NCIRX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCIRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NCIRX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

NCIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than WFSPX's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NCIRX
Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio
4.70%5.04%4.13%4.51%4.27%2.83%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
1.67%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCIRX and WFSPX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WFSPX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to NCIRX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCIRX dropped -60.34% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCIRX and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer