PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCIRX vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCIRX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio (NCIRX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCIRX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than WFSPX's 11.33% return.


NCIRX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.90%
6M
1.16%
1Y
6.94%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
-0.12%
10Y*

WFSPX

1D
0.42%
1M
3.50%
YTD
11.33%
6M
11.01%
1Y
27.85%
3Y*
22.66%
5Y*
13.97%
10Y*
15.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCIRX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NCIRX
Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio
0.90%7.94%2.33%6.33%-17.36%-0.80%-49.00%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
11.33%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%20.06%

Correlation

The correlation between NCIRX and WFSPX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2020

0.12

The correlation between NCIRX and WFSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCIRX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCIRX
NCIRX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NCIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NCIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCIRX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio (NCIRX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCIRXWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.44

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

3.22

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.40

15.03

-8.63

NCIRX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCIRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCIRX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCIRXWFSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

2.41

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.83

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.52

0.13

-0.65

Drawdowns

NCIRX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCIRX drawdown since its inception was -60.34%, roughly equal to the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCIRX and WFSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCIRXWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.34%

-58.21%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-8.90%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.94%

-18.74%

+11.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.88%

-24.51%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.45%

-0.32%

-50.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.50%

-12.77%

-40.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.90%

-0.94%

Volatility

NCIRX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio (NCIRX) is 1.26%, while iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that NCIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCIRXWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

2.87%

-1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

8.99%

-6.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

11.87%

-7.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.79%

16.88%

-10.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

18.02%

+3.56%

NCIRX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCIRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NCIRX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

NCIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, more than WFSPX's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NCIRX
Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio
5.08%5.04%4.13%4.51%4.27%2.83%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
1.57%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCIRX and WFSPX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WFSPX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to NCIRX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCIRX dropped -60.34% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCIRX and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer