NCIRX vs. TIBDX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

NCIRX (Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio) and TIBDX (TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, NCIRX returned -0.21%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TIBDX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NCIRX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TIBDX.

Performance

NCIRX vs. TIBDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio (NCIRX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCIRX achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly higher than TIBDX's 0.67% return.

NCIRX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 1.03%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 6.53%
• 3Y*: 5.19%
• 5Y*: -0.21%
• 10Y*: —

TIBDX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 0.67%
• 6M: 1.26%
• 1Y: 5.56%
• 3Y*: 4.33%
• 5Y*: 0.10%
• 10Y*: 1.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCIRX vs. TIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
NCIRX Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio	1.03%	7.94%	2.33%	6.33%	-17.36%	-0.80%	-49.00%
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund	0.67%	7.38%	1.95%	5.63%	-13.68%	-0.95%	2.58%

Correlation

The correlation between NCIRX and TIBDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020	0.95

The correlation between NCIRX and TIBDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NCIRX vs. TIBDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCIRX

NCIRX Risk / Return Rank: 45
NCIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
NCIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
NCIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
NCIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
NCIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

TIBDX

TIBDX Risk / Return Rank: 37
TIBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
TIBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
TIBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
TIBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
TIBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCIRX vs. TIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio (NCIRX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NCIRX	TIBDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.44	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	2.16	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.26	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	1.88	+0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.68	5.67	+1.02

NCIRX vs. TIBDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCIRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the TIBDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCIRX and TIBDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NCIRX vs. TIBDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCIRX drawdown since its inception was -60.34%, which is greater than TIBDX's maximum drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCIRX and TIBDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCIRX	TIBDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.34%	-18.82%	-41.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.86%	-2.98%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.94%	-6.29%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.88%	-18.82%	-4.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.39%	-1.22%	-49.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.45%	-2.30%	-51.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.98%	0.99%	-0.01%

Volatility

NCIRX vs. TIBDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio (NCIRX) is 1.31%, while TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) has a volatility of 1.38%. This indicates that NCIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCIRX	TIBDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.31%	1.38%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.81%	2.93%	-0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.00%	3.90%	+0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.79%	5.64%	+1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.54%	4.74%	+16.80%

NCIRX vs. TIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCIRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TIBDX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

NCIRX vs. TIBDX - Dividend Comparison

NCIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than TIBDX's 4.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NCIRX Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio	5.07%	5.04%	4.13%	4.51%	4.27%	2.83%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund	4.45%	4.34%	3.60%	3.22%	2.44%	2.39%	4.45%	3.09%	2.88%	2.93%	3.80%	4.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NCIRX and TIBDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, NCIRX and TIBDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NCIRX or TIBDX?

TIBDX has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to NCIRX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCIRX dropped -60.34% vs TIBDX's -18.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NCIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.