PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCIRX vs. MDVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCIRX vs. MDVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio (NCIRX) and MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCIRX achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than MDVAX's 2.33% return.


NCIRX

1D
0.13%
1M
-1.15%
6M
-0.26%
YTD
0.02%
1Y
2.85%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
-0.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-11.08%

MDVAX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.70%
6M
1.66%
YTD
2.33%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
5.74%
5Y*
-0.11%
10Y*
1.99%
ALL TIME*
3.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NCIRX vs. MDVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NCIRX
Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio
0.02%7.94%2.33%6.33%-17.36%-0.80%-49.00%
MDVAX
MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund
2.33%8.40%2.47%5.81%-17.01%1.95%6.11%

Correlation

The correlation between NCIRX and MDVAX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020

0.91

The correlation between NCIRX and MDVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCIRX vs. MDVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NCIRX
NCIRX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NCIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NCIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MDVAX
MDVAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
MDVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MDVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NCIRX vs. MDVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio (NCIRX) and MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NCIRXMDVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.42

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

2.82

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.89

11.79

-7.89

NCIRX vs. MDVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCIRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the MDVAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCIRX and MDVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NCIRX vs. MDVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCIRX drawdown since its inception was -60.34%, which is greater than MDVAX's maximum drawdown of -23.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCIRX and MDVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCIRXMDVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.34%

-23.02%

-37.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-2.21%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.48%

-4.87%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.88%

-23.02%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.89%

-3.63%

-47.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.39%

-3.47%

-49.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

0.53%

+0.55%

Volatility

NCIRX vs. MDVAX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio (NCIRX) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX) at 0.57%. This indicates that NCIRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCIRXMDVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

0.57%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

2.15%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

3.02%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.75%

6.45%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

5.26%

+16.05%

NCIRX vs. MDVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCIRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MDVAX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCIRX vs. MDVAX - Dividend Comparison

NCIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than MDVAX's 3.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDVAX
MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund
3.80%3.91%2.45%4.87%3.76%4.06%7.20%2.90%2.86%2.64%2.11%0.53%
NCIRX
Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio
4.70%5.04%4.13%4.51%4.27%2.83%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCIRX and MDVAX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NCIRX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to MDVAX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCIRX dropped -60.34% vs MDVAX's -23.02%.

MDVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCIRX and MDVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer