NCGFX vs. SVPFX
NCGFX (New Covenant Growth Fund) and SVPFX (Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, NCGFX returned 9.93%/yr vs 2.15%/yr for SVPFX. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NCGFX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for SVPFX.
Performance
NCGFX vs. SVPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCGFX achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly higher than SVPFX's 2.21% return.
NCGFX
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 7.63%
- YTD
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 20.10%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.93%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.91%
SVPFX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 5.61%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 2.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
NCGFX vs. SVPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCGFX New Covenant Growth Fund | 9.17% | 15.84% | 22.15% | 25.24% | -19.62% | 10.88% |
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund | 2.21% | 4.19% | 3.82% | 5.30% | -4.37% | 0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between NCGFX and SVPFX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021 | 0.16 |
Over the past year, NCGFX and SVPFX have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NCGFX vs. SVPFX — Risk / Return Rank
NCGFX
SVPFX
NCGFX vs. SVPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NCGFX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.60 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 6.52 | -4.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.07 | 23.79 | -15.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NCGFX vs. SVPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCGFX drawdown since its inception was -55.18%, which is greater than SVPFX's maximum drawdown of -6.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCGFX and SVPFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCGFX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.18% | -6.37% | -48.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.31% | -0.91% | -8.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.32% | -5.32% | -20.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.10% | -6.37% | -21.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | 0.00% | -1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.41% | -1.88% | -9.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 0.25% | +1.94% |
Volatility
NCGFX vs. SVPFX - Volatility Comparison
New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) at 0.60%. This indicates that NCGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NCGFX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 0.60% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.36% | 1.79% | +8.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.21% | 2.22% | +10.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 5.62% | +13.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 5.45% | +13.50% |
NCGFX vs. SVPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCGFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than SVPFX's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
NCGFX vs. SVPFX - Dividend Comparison
NCGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.87%, more than SVPFX's 3.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCGFX New Covenant Growth Fund | 8.87% | 9.67% | 10.12% | 6.81% | 1.61% | 1.45% | 4.07% | 5.55% | 8.44% | 6.54% | 0.66% | 7.83% |
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund | 3.18% | 1.83% | 4.37% | 4.29% | 0.76% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NCGFX and SVPFX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NCGFX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to SVPFX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCGFX dropped -55.18% vs SVPFX's -6.37%.
SVPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NCGFX and SVPFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer