NCGFX vs. RCKSX
NCGFX (New Covenant Growth Fund) and RCKSX (Rock Oak Core Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NCGFX returned 13.30%/yr vs 11.23%/yr for RCKSX. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. NCGFX charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for RCKSX.
Performance
NCGFX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCGFX achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly lower than RCKSX's 20.84% return. Over the past 10 years, NCGFX has outperformed RCKSX with an annualized return of 13.30%, while RCKSX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.23% annualized return.
NCGFX
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 7.63%
- YTD
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 20.10%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.93%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.91%
RCKSX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 14.90%
- YTD
- 20.84%
- 1Y
- 26.97%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
NCGFX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCGFX New Covenant Growth Fund | 9.17% | 15.84% | 22.15% | 25.24% | -19.62% | 20.69% | 20.25% | 30.23% | -6.07% | 21.60% |
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund | 20.84% | 12.99% | 15.12% | 15.57% | -18.09% | 9.96% | 13.75% | 19.05% | -2.14% | 22.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between NCGFX and RCKSX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005 | 0.88 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NCGFX and RCKSX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NCGFX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank
NCGFX
RCKSX
NCGFX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NCGFX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 5.87 | -3.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.07 | 19.20 | -11.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NCGFX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCGFX drawdown since its inception was -55.18%, roughly equal to the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCGFX and RCKSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCGFX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.18% | -57.88% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.31% | -4.14% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.32% | -18.22% | -7.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.10% | -22.54% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.28% | -33.10% | -1.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -0.28% | -1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.41% | -9.44% | -1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 1.28% | +0.91% |
Volatility
NCGFX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison
New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) at 2.54%. This indicates that NCGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NCGFX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 2.54% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.36% | 7.57% | +2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.21% | 11.36% | +1.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 15.57% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 17.39% | +1.56% |
NCGFX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCGFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
NCGFX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison
NCGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.87%, more than RCKSX's 5.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCGFX New Covenant Growth Fund | 8.87% | 9.67% | 10.12% | 6.81% | 1.61% | 1.45% | 4.07% | 5.55% | 8.44% | 6.54% | 0.66% | 7.83% |
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund | 5.18% | 6.26% | 0.47% | 0.71% | 1.00% | 4.31% | 16.56% | 3.18% | 0.59% | 5.91% | 0.70% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NCGFX and RCKSX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NCGFX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to RCKSX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCGFX dropped -55.18% vs RCKSX's -57.88%.
RCKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NCGFX and RCKSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer