NCGFX vs. QCELX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

NCGFX (New Covenant Growth Fund) and QCELX (AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NCGFX returned 13.73%/yr vs 15.06%/yr for QCELX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NCGFX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for QCELX.

Performance

NCGFX vs. QCELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCGFX achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly lower than QCELX's 17.15% return. Over the past 10 years, NCGFX has underperformed QCELX with an annualized return of 13.73%, while QCELX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.06% annualized return.

NCGFX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 6M: 10.65%
• 1Y: 26.66%
• 3Y*: 20.99%
• 5Y*: 11.10%
• 10Y*: 13.73%

QCELX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 4.20%
• YTD: 17.15%
• 6M: 18.37%
• 1Y: 36.57%
• 3Y*: 27.29%
• 5Y*: 15.79%
• 10Y*: 15.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCGFX vs. QCELX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NCGFX New Covenant Growth Fund	11.15%	15.84%	22.15%	25.24%	-19.62%	20.69%	20.25%	30.23%	-6.07%	21.60%
QCELX AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund	17.15%	23.38%	22.73%	26.30%	-15.73%	27.18%	14.93%	24.33%	-10.96%	22.73%

Correlation

The correlation between NCGFX and QCELX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.95

The correlation between NCGFX and QCELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NCGFX vs. QCELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCGFX

NCGFX Risk / Return Rank: 62
NCGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
NCGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
NCGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
NCGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
NCGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

QCELX

QCELX Risk / Return Rank: 89
QCELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
QCELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
QCELX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
QCELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QCELX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCGFX vs. QCELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NCGFX	QCELX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.97	-0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	4.04	-0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.53	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	4.78	-1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.35	21.95	-8.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NCGFX vs. QCELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCGFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the QCELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCGFX and QCELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NCGFX	QCELX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	2.97	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.84	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.80	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.72	-0.34

Drawdowns

NCGFX vs. QCELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCGFX drawdown since its inception was -55.18%, which is greater than QCELX's maximum drawdown of -33.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCGFX and QCELX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCGFX	QCELX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.18%	-33.52%	-21.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.31%	-7.92%	-1.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.32%	-18.38%	-6.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.10%	-28.70%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.28%	-33.52%	-0.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-1.05%	+0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.46%	-5.65%	-5.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	1.72%	+0.35%

Volatility

NCGFX vs. QCELX - Volatility Comparison

New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) have volatilities of 3.08% and 3.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCGFX	QCELX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	3.13%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.34%	9.37%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.33%	12.76%	-0.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.51%	18.93%	-0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.97%	18.97%	0.00%

NCGFX vs. QCELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCGFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QCELX's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

NCGFX vs. QCELX - Dividend Comparison

NCGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.70%, less than QCELX's 12.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NCGFX New Covenant Growth Fund	8.70%	9.67%	10.12%	6.81%	1.61%	1.45%	4.07%	5.55%	8.44%	6.54%	0.66%	7.83%
QCELX AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund	12.29%	14.40%	12.89%	13.67%	11.05%	12.41%	9.94%	5.36%	7.81%	0.99%	1.28%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NCGFX and QCELX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, NCGFX and QCELX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NCGFX or QCELX?

QCELX has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to NCGFX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCGFX dropped -55.18% vs QCELX's -33.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.