PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCGFX vs. FTZIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCGFX vs. FTZIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCGFX achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly lower than FTZIX's 15.86% return.


NCGFX

1D
0.55%
1M
3.56%
YTD
11.15%
6M
10.65%
1Y
26.66%
3Y*
20.99%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
13.73%

FTZIX

1D
0.33%
1M
2.79%
YTD
15.86%
6M
15.88%
1Y
37.71%
3Y*
26.97%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCGFX vs. FTZIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NCGFX
New Covenant Growth Fund
11.15%15.84%22.15%25.24%-19.62%20.69%20.25%30.23%
FTZIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund
15.86%22.63%25.31%27.18%-21.31%25.25%19.60%33.70%

Correlation

The correlation between NCGFX and FTZIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2019

0.87

The correlation between NCGFX and FTZIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCGFX vs. FTZIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCGFX
NCGFX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NCGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NCGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FTZIX
FTZIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FTZIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTZIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTZIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTZIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTZIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCGFX vs. FTZIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCGFXFTZIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

4.41

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

16.88

-3.53

NCGFX vs. FTZIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCGFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the FTZIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCGFX and FTZIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCGFXFTZIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.43

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.71

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.84

-0.46

Drawdowns

NCGFX vs. FTZIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCGFX drawdown since its inception was -55.18%, which is greater than FTZIX's maximum drawdown of -37.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCGFX and FTZIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCGFXFTZIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.18%

-37.22%

-17.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.31%

-9.03%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.32%

-18.65%

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.10%

-29.53%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

0.00%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.46%

-6.50%

-4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.35%

-0.28%

Volatility

NCGFX vs. FTZIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) is 3.08%, while Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that NCGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTZIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCGFXFTZIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

5.31%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

12.81%

-3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

16.35%

-4.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.51%

19.43%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

22.33%

-3.36%

NCGFX vs. FTZIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCGFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than FTZIX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCGFX vs. FTZIX - Dividend Comparison

NCGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.70%, more than FTZIX's 0.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTZIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund
0.04%0.05%0.11%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.26%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NCGFX
New Covenant Growth Fund
8.70%9.67%10.12%6.81%1.61%1.45%4.07%5.55%8.44%6.54%0.66%7.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCGFX and FTZIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTZIX has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to NCGFX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCGFX dropped -55.18% vs FTZIX's -37.22%.

FTZIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCGFX and FTZIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer