PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCGFX vs. AUEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCGFX vs. AUEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) and AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCGFX achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly higher than AUEIX's 7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, NCGFX has outperformed AUEIX with an annualized return of 13.30%, while AUEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.72% annualized return.


NCGFX

1D
1.68%
1M
-1.01%
6M
7.63%
YTD
9.17%
1Y
20.10%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
13.30%
ALL TIME*
6.91%

AUEIX

1D
0.58%
1M
1.28%
6M
4.68%
YTD
7.82%
1Y
10.25%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
5.93%
10Y*
10.72%
ALL TIME*
12.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NCGFX vs. AUEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NCGFX
New Covenant Growth Fund
9.17%15.84%22.15%25.24%-19.62%20.69%20.25%30.23%-6.07%21.60%
AUEIX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund
7.82%6.95%13.85%9.49%-13.81%23.52%13.10%28.63%-0.27%22.14%

Correlation

The correlation between NCGFX and AUEIX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2012

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between NCGFX and AUEIX has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCGFX vs. AUEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NCGFX
NCGFX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
NCGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
NCGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

AUEIX
AUEIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
AUEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
AUEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NCGFX vs. AUEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) and AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NCGFXAUEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.19

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

1.45

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.07

4.81

+3.26

NCGFX vs. AUEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCGFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the AUEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCGFX and AUEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NCGFX vs. AUEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCGFX drawdown since its inception was -55.18%, which is greater than AUEIX's maximum drawdown of -30.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCGFX and AUEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCGFXAUEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.18%

-30.82%

-24.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.31%

-5.91%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.32%

-10.27%

-15.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.10%

-22.08%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

-30.82%

-3.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-0.31%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.41%

-3.39%

-8.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.78%

+0.41%

Volatility

NCGFX vs. AUEIX - Volatility Comparison

New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX) at 1.82%. This indicates that NCGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCGFXAUEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

1.82%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.36%

6.22%

+4.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.21%

8.23%

+4.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.62%

13.00%

+5.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.95%

15.17%

+3.78%

NCGFX vs. AUEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCGFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than AUEIX's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCGFX vs. AUEIX - Dividend Comparison

NCGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.87%, less than AUEIX's 21.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUEIX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund
21.05%22.70%24.31%24.28%10.26%2.54%1.29%1.12%1.67%2.36%1.99%6.18%
NCGFX
New Covenant Growth Fund
8.87%9.67%10.12%6.81%1.61%1.45%4.07%5.55%8.44%6.54%0.66%7.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCGFX and AUEIX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NCGFX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to AUEIX (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCGFX dropped -55.18% vs AUEIX's -30.82%.

NCGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCGFX and AUEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer