NCDL vs. XYLD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp. (NCDL) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD).

XYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2013.

Performance

NCDL vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp. (NCDL) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NCDL vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NCDL Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp.	-1.83%	-9.92%	6.15%
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	-0.58%	8.02%	17.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCDL achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's -0.58% return.

NCDL

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: -1.83%
• 6M: -1.05%
• 1Y: -15.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XYLD

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -2.54%
• YTD: -0.58%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 10.98%
• 3Y*: 10.37%
• 5Y*: 7.05%
• 10Y*: 7.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NCDL vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCDL

NCDL Risk / Return Rank: 13
NCDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
NCDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
NCDL Omega Ratio Rank: 14
NCDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
NCDL Martin Ratio Rank: 15

XYLD

XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 51
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 69
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCDL vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp. (NCDL) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NCDL	XYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.69	0.79	-1.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.84	1.27	-2.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.26	-0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	1.09	-1.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	6.37	-7.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NCDL vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCDL Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCDL and XYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NCDL	XYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.69	0.79	-1.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.15	0.57	-0.72

Correlation

The correlation between NCDL and XYLD is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NCDL vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

NCDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.79%, more than XYLD's 10.93% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NCDL Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp.	13.79%	14.24%	12.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	10.93%	10.51%	11.54%	10.51%	13.43%	9.07%	7.93%	5.76%	7.12%	5.18%	3.23%	4.65%

Drawdowns

NCDL vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCDL drawdown since its inception was -20.71%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCDL and XYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCDL	XYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.71%	-33.46%	+12.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.71%	-10.14%	-10.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.36%	-2.94%	-15.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.43%	-3.76%	-2.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.31%	1.73%	+10.58%

Volatility

NCDL vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp. (NCDL) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 4.03%. This indicates that NCDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCDL	XYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.49%	4.03%	+2.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.10%	5.83%	+10.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.85%	13.99%	+8.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.42%	11.30%	+8.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.42%	14.23%	+5.19%