PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCBIX vs. PUDZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCBIX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Covenant Balanced Income Fund (NCBIX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCBIX achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly lower than PUDZX's 13.05% return. Over the past 10 years, NCBIX has underperformed PUDZX with an annualized return of 5.53%, while PUDZX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.68% annualized return.


NCBIX

1D
0.64%
1M
-0.71%
6M
2.35%
YTD
3.05%
1Y
8.35%
3Y*
8.55%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
5.53%
ALL TIME*
4.34%

PUDZX

1D
0.28%
1M
2.38%
6M
6.88%
YTD
13.05%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
6.68%
ALL TIME*
4.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NCBIX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NCBIX
New Covenant Balanced Income Fund
3.05%10.38%8.77%11.71%-13.79%6.85%11.65%14.60%-2.01%8.69%
PUDZX
PGIM Real Assets Fund
13.05%13.40%8.61%3.26%-2.76%18.49%4.84%16.29%-9.20%6.22%

Correlation

The correlation between NCBIX and PUDZX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between NCBIX and PUDZX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCBIX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NCBIX
NCBIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NCBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NCBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

PUDZX
PUDZX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PUDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PUDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NCBIX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Covenant Balanced Income Fund (NCBIX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NCBIXPUDZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.49

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

4.10

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.60

12.61

-4.01

NCBIX vs. PUDZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the PUDZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCBIX and PUDZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NCBIX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCBIX drawdown since its inception was -32.19%, which is greater than PUDZX's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCBIX and PUDZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCBIXPUDZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.19%

-21.53%

-10.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.05%

-5.01%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.29%

-8.20%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.67%

-17.98%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.67%

-21.53%

+3.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-2.10%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-5.24%

+1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

1.63%

-0.69%

Volatility

NCBIX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for New Covenant Balanced Income Fund (NCBIX) is 1.56%, while PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) has a volatility of 1.88%. This indicates that NCBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PUDZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCBIXPUDZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

1.88%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.61%

6.16%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.65%

7.77%

-2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.23%

10.42%

-3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.08%

9.68%

-2.60%

NCBIX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCBIX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NCBIX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison

NCBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, less than PUDZX's 7.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NCBIX
New Covenant Balanced Income Fund
5.99%6.15%5.21%1.97%2.72%4.22%5.49%4.14%5.85%2.05%1.23%7.37%
PUDZX
PGIM Real Assets Fund
7.09%8.93%6.67%3.66%9.10%13.00%4.94%3.40%2.14%2.10%1.39%1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCBIX and PUDZX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PUDZX has higher volatility (1.88%) compared to NCBIX (1.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCBIX dropped -32.19% vs PUDZX's -21.53%.

PUDZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCBIX and PUDZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer