NCBIX vs. FRGAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

NCBIX (New Covenant Balanced Income Fund) and FRGAX (Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 3 years, NCBIX returned 8.55%/yr vs 13.87%/yr for FRGAX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. NCBIX charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FRGAX.

Performance

NCBIX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Covenant Balanced Income Fund (NCBIX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCBIX achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly lower than FRGAX's 7.61% return.

NCBIX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: -0.71%
• 6M: 2.35%
• YTD: 3.05%
• 1Y: 8.35%
• 3Y*: 8.55%
• 5Y*: 3.82%
• 10Y*: 5.53%
• ALL TIME*: 4.34%

FRGAX

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: -0.67%
• 6M: 5.42%
• YTD: 7.61%
• 1Y: 16.57%
• 3Y*: 13.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
NCBIX New Covenant Balanced Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

NCBIX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NCBIX New Covenant Balanced Income Fund	3.05%	10.38%	8.77%	11.71%	-0.62%
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund	7.61%	17.10%	12.91%	17.57%	-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between NCBIX and FRGAX is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022	0.92

The correlation between NCBIX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NCBIX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NCBIX

NCBIX Risk / Return Rank: 54
NCBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
NCBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NCBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
NCBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
NCBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

FRGAX

FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NCBIX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Covenant Balanced Income Fund (NCBIX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NCBIX	FRGAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.57	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	2.25	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.29	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	2.21	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.60	9.26	-0.66

NCBIX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCBIX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NCBIX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCBIX drawdown since its inception was -32.19%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCBIX and FRGAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCBIX	FRGAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.19%	-11.77%	-20.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.05%	-7.03%	+2.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.29%	-11.77%	+5.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	-1.61%	+0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.46%	-1.57%	-1.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	1.67%	-0.73%

Volatility

NCBIX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for New Covenant Balanced Income Fund (NCBIX) is 1.56%, while Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) has a volatility of 2.74%. This indicates that NCBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCBIX	FRGAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.56%	2.74%	-1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.61%	8.17%	-3.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.65%	9.88%	-4.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.23%	10.38%	-3.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.08%	10.38%	-3.30%

NCBIX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCBIX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

NCBIX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

NCBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than FRGAX's 1.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund	1.86%	2.00%	2.01%	1.77%	1.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NCBIX New Covenant Balanced Income Fund	5.99%	6.15%	5.21%	1.97%	2.72%	4.22%	5.49%	4.14%	5.85%	2.05%	1.23%	7.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NCBIX and FRGAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, NCBIX and FRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NCBIX or FRGAX?

FRGAX has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to NCBIX (1.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCBIX dropped -32.19% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.