PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCBIX vs. DGTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCBIX vs. DGTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Covenant Balanced Income Fund (NCBIX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCBIX achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly lower than DGTSX's 4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, NCBIX has outperformed DGTSX with an annualized return of 5.53%, while DGTSX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.07% annualized return.


NCBIX

1D
0.64%
1M
-0.71%
6M
2.35%
YTD
3.05%
1Y
8.35%
3Y*
8.55%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
5.53%
ALL TIME*
4.34%

DGTSX

1D
0.42%
1M
-0.07%
6M
2.97%
YTD
4.21%
1Y
8.21%
3Y*
7.71%
5Y*
5.06%
10Y*
5.07%
ALL TIME*
4.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NCBIX vs. DGTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NCBIX
New Covenant Balanced Income Fund
3.05%10.38%8.77%11.71%-13.79%6.85%11.65%14.60%-2.01%8.69%
DGTSX
DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio
4.21%8.39%7.43%8.93%-8.06%10.20%7.29%9.80%-1.85%5.83%

Correlation

The correlation between NCBIX and DGTSX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2003

0.92

The correlation between NCBIX and DGTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCBIX vs. DGTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NCBIX
NCBIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NCBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NCBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

DGTSX
DGTSX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DGTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DGTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NCBIX vs. DGTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Covenant Balanced Income Fund (NCBIX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NCBIXDGTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.43

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

3.02

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.60

13.04

-4.44

NCBIX vs. DGTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the DGTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCBIX and DGTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NCBIX vs. DGTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCBIX drawdown since its inception was -32.19%, which is greater than DGTSX's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCBIX and DGTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCBIXDGTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.19%

-16.71%

-15.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.05%

-2.64%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.29%

-7.46%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.67%

-11.26%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.67%

-11.26%

-6.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-0.28%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-1.64%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.61%

+0.33%

Volatility

NCBIX vs. DGTSX - Volatility Comparison

New Covenant Balanced Income Fund (NCBIX) has a higher volatility of 1.56% compared to DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) at 0.91%. This indicates that NCBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCBIXDGTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

0.91%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.61%

3.01%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.65%

3.65%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.23%

5.98%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.08%

5.23%

+1.85%

NCBIX vs. DGTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCBIX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DGTSX's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NCBIX vs. DGTSX - Dividend Comparison

NCBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than DGTSX's 5.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGTSX
DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio
5.81%5.54%7.28%4.75%2.77%7.62%2.12%2.57%2.99%1.25%1.26%1.50%
NCBIX
New Covenant Balanced Income Fund
5.99%6.15%5.21%1.97%2.72%4.22%5.49%4.14%5.85%2.05%1.23%7.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, NCBIX and DGTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NCBIX has higher volatility (1.56%) compared to DGTSX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCBIX dropped -32.19% vs DGTSX's -16.71%.

DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCBIX and DGTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer