PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCATX vs. NSGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCATX vs. NSGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern California Tax Exempt Fund (NCATX) and Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCATX achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than NSGRX's 20.44% return. Over the past 10 years, NCATX has underperformed NSGRX with an annualized return of 1.44%, while NSGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.56% annualized return.


NCATX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.86%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.38%
1Y
6.10%
3Y*
3.32%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*
1.44%

NSGRX

1D
0.66%
1M
3.01%
YTD
20.44%
6M
17.85%
1Y
37.91%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCATX vs. NSGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NCATX
Northern California Tax Exempt Fund
1.29%3.65%1.89%5.74%-11.26%0.74%4.85%7.67%1.00%4.97%
NSGRX
Northern Small Cap Core Fund
20.44%10.57%10.44%16.96%-16.14%19.99%14.53%23.30%-10.22%13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between NCATX and NSGRX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1999

-0.10

The correlation between NCATX and NSGRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCATX vs. NSGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCATX
NCATX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NCATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCATX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
NCATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCATX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

NSGRX
NSGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NSGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
NSGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCATX vs. NSGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern California Tax Exempt Fund (NCATX) and Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NCATXNSGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.36

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

4.49

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.43

15.70

-9.27

NCATX vs. NSGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCATX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the NSGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCATX and NSGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NCATX vs. NSGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCATX drawdown since its inception was -16.55%, smaller than the maximum NSGRX drawdown of -64.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCATX and NSGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCATXNSGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.55%

-64.89%

+48.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-8.66%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.80%

-26.45%

+20.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.55%

-32.31%

+15.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.55%

-40.37%

+23.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-0.10%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-22.12%

+19.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

2.46%

-1.52%

Volatility

NCATX vs. NSGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern California Tax Exempt Fund (NCATX) is 0.78%, while Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that NCATX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NSGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCATXNSGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

5.60%

-4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.05%

13.06%

-11.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56%

18.53%

-15.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.13%

23.41%

-19.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.25%

23.38%

-19.13%

NCATX vs. NSGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCATX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than NSGRX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCATX vs. NSGRX - Dividend Comparison

NCATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than NSGRX's 13.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NCATX
Northern California Tax Exempt Fund
2.73%2.85%3.39%2.46%1.47%2.18%2.85%3.82%3.51%3.19%4.08%3.21%
NSGRX
Northern Small Cap Core Fund
13.16%15.85%17.77%6.90%0.55%15.75%5.00%6.30%1.26%4.35%0.67%3.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCATX and NSGRX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NSGRX has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to NCATX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCATX dropped -16.55% vs NSGRX's -64.89%.

NCATX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCATX and NSGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer