PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBTX vs. K
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NBTX vs. K - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nanobiotix S.A. (NBTX) and Kellogg Company (K). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NBTX

1D
-4.41%
1M
-0.04%
6M
82.79%
YTD
66.03%
1Y
464.49%
3Y*
72.87%
5Y*
21.12%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.22%

K

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.19M$4.97M$3.90M

NBTX vs. K - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NBTX
Nanobiotix S.A.
66.03%705.57%-60.58%98.37%-54.69%-50.91%-9.09%
K
Kellogg Company
0.00%5.99%49.75%-7.44%14.35%7.44%0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between NBTX and K is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2020

-0.02

The correlation between NBTX and K shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.05 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NBTX:

$1.94B

K:

$29.20B

Total Revenue (TTM)

NBTX:

€47.94M

K:

$12.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NBTX:

€47.94M

K:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

NBTX:

-€55.82M

K:

$2.25B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBTX vs. K — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NBTX
NBTX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
NBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

K

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NBTX vs. K - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nanobiotix S.A. (NBTX) and Kellogg Company (K). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBTXKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.20

NBTX vs. K - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBTX vs. K - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBTXKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.89%

Volatility

NBTX vs. K - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBTXKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

136.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

130.40%

Dividends

NBTX vs. K - Dividend Comparison

Neither NBTX nor K has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
K
Kellogg Company
1.39%2.76%2.79%10.56%3.28%3.59%3.66%3.27%3.86%3.12%2.77%2.74%
NBTX
Nanobiotix S.A.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NBTX vs. K - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nanobiotix S.A. and Kellogg Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NBTX and K have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBTX and K

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer