PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBTR vs. NBCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBTR vs. NBCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Total Return Bond ETF (NBTR) and Neuberger Core Equity ETF (NBCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBTR achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than NBCR's 5.84% return.


NBTR

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.65%
YTD
0.62%
6M
0.76%
1Y
5.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NBCR

1D
-0.63%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
5.84%
6M
5.14%
1Y
21.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBTR vs. NBCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NBTR
Neuberger Total Return Bond ETF
0.62%8.07%-0.93%
NBCR
Neuberger Core Equity ETF
5.84%18.69%-2.43%

Correlation

The correlation between NBTR and NBCR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBTR vs. NBCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBTR
NBTR Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
NBTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NBTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

NBCR
NBCR Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
NBCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBCR Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
NBCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBCR Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBTR vs. NBCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Total Return Bond ETF (NBTR) and Neuberger Core Equity ETF (NBCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBTRNBCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.06

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

8.70

-2.25

NBTR vs. NBCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the NBCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBTR and NBCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBTR vs. NBCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBTR drawdown since its inception was -2.58%, smaller than the maximum NBCR drawdown of -18.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBTR and NBCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBTRNBCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-18.23%

+15.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.54%

-10.35%

+7.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-1.68%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.64%

-2.22%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

2.45%

-1.61%

Volatility

NBTR vs. NBCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Total Return Bond ETF (NBTR) is 0.84%, while Neuberger Core Equity ETF (NBCR) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that NBTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBTRNBCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

4.10%

-3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

9.45%

-6.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.50%

11.93%

-8.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.10%

16.69%

-12.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.10%

16.69%

-12.59%

NBTR vs. NBCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBTR has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than NBCR's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBTR vs. NBCR - Dividend Comparison

NBTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.57%, more than NBCR's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
NBCR
Neuberger Core Equity ETF
0.43%0.45%0.47%
NBTR
Neuberger Total Return Bond ETF
5.57%5.76%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBTR and NBCR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBCR has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to NBTR (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBTR dropped -2.58% vs NBCR's -18.23%.

On 1-year performance, NBCR leads with 21.22% vs 5.42% for NBTR. On fees, NBCR is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, NBTR has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NBCR has performed better with a 21.22% return vs 5.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NBCR is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for NBTR.

NBTR has the higher dividend yield at 5.57%, compared with 0.43% for NBCR.

NBTR is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while NBCR is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for NBTR and 0.29% for NBCR.

NBCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBTR and NBCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer