NBSD vs. BSV
NBSD (Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF) and BSV (Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares) are both Short-Term Bond funds. NBSD is actively managed, while BSV is passively managed. Over the past year, NBSD returned 4.72% vs 3.68% for BSV. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NBSD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BSV.
Performance
NBSD vs. BSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBSD achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than BSV's 0.29% return.
NBSD
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 4.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSV
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 4.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
NBSD vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NBSD Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF | 0.83% | 6.18% | 3.97% |
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 0.29% | 6.00% | 2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBSD and BSV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between NBSD and BSV shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBSD vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank
NBSD
BSV
NBSD vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF (NBSD) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBSD | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | 1.39 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 2.87 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.74 | 10.07 | +10.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBSD | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24 | 2.05 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.05 | 0.85 | +1.20 |
Drawdowns
NBSD vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBSD drawdown since its inception was -2.63%, smaller than the maximum BSV drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBSD and BSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBSD | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.63% | -8.54% | +5.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.19% | -1.29% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.63% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.23% | -0.97% | +0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 0.37% | -0.14% |
Volatility
NBSD vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF (NBSD) is 0.35%, while Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) has a volatility of 0.52%. This indicates that NBSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBSD | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.35% | 0.52% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.01% | 1.26% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47% | 1.81% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 2.72% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 2.37% | +0.41% |
NBSD vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBSD vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison
NBSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than BSV's 4.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 4.00% | 3.83% | 3.38% | 2.46% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.65% | 1.48% | 1.40% |
NBSD Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF | 4.81% | 5.06% | 2.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBSD and BSV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSV has higher volatility (0.52%) compared to NBSD (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBSD dropped -2.63% vs BSV's -8.54%.
On 1-year performance, NBSD leads with 4.72% vs 3.68% for BSV. On fees, BSV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, NBSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NBSD has performed better with a 4.72% return vs 3.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NBSD.
NBSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 4.00% for BSV.
They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NBSD and 0.03% for BSV.
NBSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBSD and BSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer