PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBRVX vs. VMVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBRVX vs. VMVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund (NBRVX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBRVX achieves a 14.17% return, which is significantly lower than VMVAX's 16.91% return. Over the past 10 years, NBRVX has underperformed VMVAX with an annualized return of 7.66%, while VMVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.77% annualized return.


NBRVX

1D
0.60%
1M
-0.99%
6M
10.42%
YTD
14.17%
1Y
28.55%
3Y*
12.27%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*
7.66%
ALL TIME*
6.44%

VMVAX

1D
-0.33%
1M
2.54%
6M
12.16%
YTD
16.91%
1Y
26.28%
3Y*
15.18%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
10.77%
ALL TIME*
12.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NBRVX vs. VMVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBRVX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund
14.17%11.01%9.11%11.05%-9.75%32.67%-4.29%17.22%-14.98%9.69%
VMVAX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares
16.91%12.06%13.63%10.12%-7.89%28.77%2.45%28.03%-12.44%17.04%

Correlation

The correlation between NBRVX and VMVAX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2011

0.93

The correlation between NBRVX and VMVAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBRVX vs. VMVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NBRVX
NBRVX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NBRVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBRVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBRVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NBRVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBRVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VMVAX
VMVAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VMVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NBRVX vs. VMVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund (NBRVX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBRVXVMVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

3.58

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.62

13.96

-4.33

NBRVX vs. VMVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBRVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the VMVAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBRVX and VMVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBRVX vs. VMVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBRVX drawdown since its inception was -65.68%, which is greater than VMVAX's maximum drawdown of -43.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBRVX and VMVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBRVXVMVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.68%

-43.07%

-22.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.88%

-6.95%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.62%

-18.40%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.62%

-19.75%

-4.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.24%

-43.07%

-9.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-1.07%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-4.33%

-6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

1.78%

+0.85%

Volatility

NBRVX vs. VMVAX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund (NBRVX) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX) at 2.69%. This indicates that NBRVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBRVXVMVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

2.69%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.61%

8.12%

+3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.94%

11.39%

+4.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.21%

15.88%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.40%

18.69%

+2.71%

NBRVX vs. VMVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBRVX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVAX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBRVX vs. VMVAX - Dividend Comparison

NBRVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.84%, more than VMVAX's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBRVX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund
9.84%11.23%6.19%1.94%0.90%0.54%0.04%1.10%9.15%0.49%0.52%12.52%
VMVAX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.81%2.10%2.11%2.26%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.08%2.75%1.86%1.91%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBRVX and VMVAX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBRVX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to VMVAX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBRVX dropped -65.68% vs VMVAX's -43.07%.

VMVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBRVX and VMVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer