PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBMIX vs. DSCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBMIX vs. DSCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX) and Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NBMIX having a 20.21% return and DSCIX slightly higher at 21.19%. Over the past 10 years, NBMIX has outperformed DSCIX with an annualized return of 15.19%, while DSCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.70% annualized return.


NBMIX

1D
2.56%
1M
6.28%
YTD
20.21%
6M
17.81%
1Y
39.38%
3Y*
20.63%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
15.19%

DSCIX

1D
0.28%
1M
3.77%
YTD
21.19%
6M
19.93%
1Y
44.70%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBMIX vs. DSCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBMIX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund
20.21%9.87%25.90%10.01%-24.43%4.16%42.83%34.55%4.80%28.16%
DSCIX
Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund
21.19%13.18%5.10%20.00%-21.46%30.92%13.33%21.51%-16.96%11.59%

Correlation

The correlation between NBMIX and DSCIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.88

The correlation between NBMIX and DSCIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBMIX vs. DSCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBMIX
NBMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
NBMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
NBMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

DSCIX
DSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBMIX vs. DSCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX) and Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBMIXDSCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.46

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

6.66

-4.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.11

23.94

-14.83

NBMIX vs. DSCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the DSCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBMIX and DSCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBMIXDSCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

2.74

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.37

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.42

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.41

-0.01

Drawdowns

NBMIX vs. DSCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBMIX drawdown since its inception was -78.77%, which is greater than DSCIX's maximum drawdown of -47.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBMIX and DSCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBMIXDSCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.77%

-47.60%

-31.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.65%

-7.08%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.53%

-32.94%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.96%

-32.94%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.55%

-47.60%

+8.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.51%

-9.87%

-24.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

1.97%

+2.51%

Volatility

NBMIX vs. DSCIX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX) has a higher volatility of 8.85% compared to Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX) at 4.53%. This indicates that NBMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBMIXDSCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.85%

4.53%

+4.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.44%

12.06%

+7.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.51%

17.19%

+7.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.87%

22.18%

+2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.42%

23.25%

+1.17%

NBMIX vs. DSCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBMIX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than DSCIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBMIX vs. DSCIX - Dividend Comparison

NBMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%, more than DSCIX's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSCIX
Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund
4.96%6.01%0.16%0.30%4.99%8.71%0.05%0.00%9.11%0.03%0.18%0.00%
NBMIX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund
5.60%6.74%0.46%0.00%0.00%18.71%1.06%3.98%23.77%1.44%0.00%5.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBMIX and DSCIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBMIX has higher volatility (8.85%) compared to DSCIX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBMIX dropped -78.77% vs DSCIX's -47.60%.

DSCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBMIX and DSCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer