NBMAX vs. NMTRX
NBMAX (Nuveen Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund) and NMTRX (Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, NBMAX returned 1.68%/yr vs 2.29%/yr for NMTRX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NBMAX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for NMTRX.
Performance
NBMAX vs. NMTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBMAX achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than NMTRX's 2.68% return. Over the past 10 years, NBMAX has underperformed NMTRX with an annualized return of 1.68%, while NMTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.29% annualized return.
NBMAX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 6.87%
- 3Y*
- 3.14%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
NMTRX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.52%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
NBMAX vs. NMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBMAX Nuveen Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund | 1.87% | 2.55% | 1.95% | 5.62% | -11.47% | 2.18% | 4.95% | 7.88% | 0.06% | 5.51% |
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts | 2.68% | 3.90% | 1.99% | 6.21% | -11.98% | 2.69% | 5.25% | 9.26% | 1.06% | 7.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBMAX and NMTRX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007 | 0.88 |
The correlation between NBMAX and NMTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBMAX vs. NMTRX — Risk / Return Rank
NBMAX
NMTRX
NBMAX vs. NMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund (NBMAX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBMAX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | 1.71 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 3.14 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.41 | 11.55 | -1.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBMAX vs. NMTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBMAX drawdown since its inception was -21.96%, which is greater than NMTRX's maximum drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBMAX and NMTRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBMAX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.96% | -16.36% | -5.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.16% | -2.65% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.83% | -5.77% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.62% | -16.36% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.62% | -16.36% | +0.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | 0.00% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -2.90% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 0.72% | -0.06% |
Volatility
NBMAX vs. NMTRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund (NBMAX) is 0.61%, while Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) has a volatility of 0.88%. This indicates that NBMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBMAX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 0.88% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.76% | 2.24% | -0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54% | 2.97% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.93% | 4.02% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.20% | 4.40% | -0.20% |
NBMAX vs. NMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBMAX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than NMTRX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBMAX vs. NMTRX - Dividend Comparison
NBMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than NMTRX's 4.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBMAX Nuveen Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund | 3.28% | 3.56% | 3.34% | 2.92% | 2.39% | 1.96% | 2.49% | 3.09% | 3.15% | 3.04% | 3.37% | 3.64% |
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts | 4.57% | 4.46% | 3.55% | 3.67% | 3.28% | 2.73% | 2.92% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 3.28% | 3.71% | 3.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBMAX and NMTRX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NMTRX has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to NBMAX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBMAX dropped -21.96% vs NMTRX's -16.36%.
NMTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBMAX and NMTRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer