NBIL vs. NTSD
NBIL (GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NBIL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
NBIL vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NBIL
- 1D
- -7.17%
- 1M
- 83.16%
- YTD
- 462.18%
- 6M
- 280.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIL vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NBIL GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 244.81% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 17.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIL and NTSD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIL vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBIL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 5.08 | -3.78 |
Drawdowns
NBIL vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIL drawdown since its inception was -77.87%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIL and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.87% | -5.20% | -72.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.98% | -1.11% | -8.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.90% | -0.84% | -44.06% |
Volatility
NBIL vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 199.38% | 24.28% | +175.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 199.38% | 24.28% | +175.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 199.38% | 24.28% | +175.10% |
NBIL vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIL vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither NBIL nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIL and NTSD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NBIL.
NBIL and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NBIL and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for NBIL and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer