NBIG vs. NFLU
NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NBIG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NFLU.
Performance
NBIG vs. NFLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIG achieves a 126.41% return, which is significantly higher than NFLU's -50.09% return.
NBIG
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -36.58%
- 6M
- 133.65%
- YTD
- 126.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
NFLU
- 1D
- -4.37%
- 1M
- -16.63%
- 6M
- -36.31%
- YTD
- -50.09%
- 1Y
- -70.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -20.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $50.87M | $45.72M | $37.32M | |
| $3.54M | $5.25M | $4.46M |
NBIG vs. NFLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 126.41% | -59.80% |
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF | -50.09% | -29.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIG and NFLU is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIG vs. NFLU — Risk / Return Rank
NBIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NFLU
NBIG vs. NFLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIG | NFLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.77 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.91 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.44 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIG vs. NFLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIG drawdown since its inception was -78.77%, roughly equal to the maximum NFLU drawdown of -80.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIG and NFLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIG | NFLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.77% | -80.45% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -77.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.61% | -78.21% | +11.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.08% | -32.00% | -10.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 48.81% | — |
Volatility
NBIG vs. NFLU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIG | NFLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 55.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 218.72% | 69.89% | +148.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 218.72% | 69.64% | +149.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 218.72% | 69.64% | +149.08% |
NBIG vs. NFLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIG vs. NFLU - Dividend Comparison
Neither NBIG nor NFLU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIG and NFLU have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.
NBIG and NFLU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NBIG and 1.05% for NFLU.
Find the right allocation for NBIG and NFLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer