PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIG vs. NFLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBIG vs. NFLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIG achieves a 453.13% return, which is significantly higher than NFLU's -32.34% return.


NBIG

1D
-6.73%
1M
83.04%
YTD
453.13%
6M
273.38%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFLU

1D
-4.65%
1M
-21.10%
YTD
-32.34%
6M
-45.65%
1Y
-64.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIG vs. NFLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NBIG and NFLU is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIG vs. NFLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIG

NFLU
NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIG vs. NFLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NBIG vs. NFLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBIGNFLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

-0.10

+1.31

Drawdowns

NBIG vs. NFLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIG drawdown since its inception was -75.83%, which is greater than NFLU's maximum drawdown of -72.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIG and NFLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBIGNFLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.83%

-72.10%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.57%

-70.46%

+60.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.08%

-27.92%

-15.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.27%

Volatility

NBIG vs. NFLU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBIGNFLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

201.21%

66.63%

+134.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

201.21%

69.18%

+132.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

201.21%

69.18%

+132.03%

NBIG vs. NFLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLU's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBIG vs. NFLU - Dividend Comparison

Neither NBIG nor NFLU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NBIG and NFLU have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

NBIG and NFLU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NBIG and 1.05% for NFLU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIG and NFLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer