NBIG vs. CVSB
NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and CVSB (Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NBIG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while CVSB is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Calvert. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. NBIG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for CVSB.
Performance
NBIG vs. CVSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIG achieves a 526.74% return, which is significantly higher than CVSB's 1.62% return.
NBIG
- 1D
- -5.81%
- 1M
- 51.57%
- YTD
- 526.74%
- 6M
- 438.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVSB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIG vs. CVSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 526.74% | -59.80% |
CVSB Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF | 1.62% | 0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIG and CVSB is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIG vs. CVSB — Risk / Return Rank
NBIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CVSB
NBIG vs. CVSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF (CVSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIG | CVSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 19.12 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 79.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIG vs. CVSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIG drawdown since its inception was -75.83%, which is greater than CVSB's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIG and CVSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIG | CVSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.83% | -0.63% | -75.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.58% | -0.00% | -7.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -0.05% | -40.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility
NBIG vs. CVSB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIG | CVSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 199.11% | 0.83% | +198.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 199.11% | 1.31% | +197.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 199.11% | 1.31% | +197.80% |
NBIG vs. CVSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CVSB's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIG vs. CVSB - Dividend Comparison
NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CVSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVSB Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF | 4.37% | 4.72% | 5.13% | 4.95% |
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIG and CVSB have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CVSB is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CVSB is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NBIG.
CVSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.
NBIG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CVSB is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Calvert. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NBIG and 0.24% for CVSB.
Find the right allocation for NBIG and CVSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer