NBIG vs. BULZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ).
NBIG and BULZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NBIG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Oct 27, 2025. BULZ is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation. It was launched on Aug 17, 2021.
Performance
NBIG vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NBIG vs. BULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 9.01% | -62.34% |
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN | -28.68% | -17.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIG achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly higher than BULZ's -28.68% return.
NBIG
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- 10.38%
- YTD
- 9.01%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BULZ
- 1D
- 5.23%
- 1M
- -12.77%
- YTD
- -28.68%
- 6M
- -31.57%
- 1Y
- 72.81%
- 3Y*
- 59.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NBIG vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BULZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NBIG vs. BULZ — Risk / Return Rank
NBIG
BULZ
NBIG vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBIG | BULZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | -0.06 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIG and BULZ is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NBIG vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither NBIG nor BULZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
NBIG vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIG drawdown since its inception was -75.83%, smaller than the maximum BULZ drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIG and BULZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIG | BULZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.83% | -94.44% | +18.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -54.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.63% | -46.52% | -16.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.63% | -60.15% | +6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.25% | — |
Volatility
NBIG vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NBIG | BULZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 29.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 60.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 198.26% | 92.48% | +105.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 198.26% | 91.56% | +106.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 198.26% | 91.56% | +106.70% |