PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBGNX vs. ODMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBGNX vs. ODMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) and Invesco Developing Markets Fund (ODMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBGNX achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly lower than ODMAX's 20.10% return. Over the past 10 years, NBGNX has outperformed ODMAX with an annualized return of 9.38%, while ODMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.76% annualized return.


NBGNX

1D
2.10%
1M
3.98%
YTD
9.80%
6M
7.34%
1Y
11.89%
3Y*
6.33%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
9.38%

ODMAX

1D
1.59%
1M
4.42%
YTD
20.10%
6M
21.73%
1Y
42.86%
3Y*
13.85%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
7.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBGNX vs. ODMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
9.80%-4.70%9.04%15.57%-19.49%18.07%24.86%29.47%-6.91%15.83%
ODMAX
Invesco Developing Markets Fund
20.10%28.34%-1.39%11.17%-25.16%-7.54%17.22%24.02%-12.14%34.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NBGNX and ODMAX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 1996

0.61

The correlation between NBGNX and ODMAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBGNX vs. ODMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBGNX
NBGNX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
NBGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

ODMAX
ODMAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ODMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ODMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ODMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ODMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ODMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBGNX vs. ODMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) and Invesco Developing Markets Fund (ODMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBGNXODMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.44

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

3.52

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.87

13.08

-10.21

NBGNX vs. ODMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBGNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the ODMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBGNX and ODMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBGNX vs. ODMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBGNX drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, smaller than the maximum ODMAX drawdown of -61.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBGNX and ODMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBGNXODMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.75%

-61.63%

+9.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-12.08%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.51%

-18.26%

-9.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.33%

-44.52%

+16.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.53%

-46.23%

+11.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.48%

-2.98%

-3.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-14.57%

+7.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

3.24%

+0.79%

Volatility

NBGNX vs. ODMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) is 4.69%, while Invesco Developing Markets Fund (ODMAX) has a volatility of 9.02%. This indicates that NBGNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ODMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBGNXODMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

9.02%

-4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

15.70%

-4.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.29%

18.19%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

18.10%

+1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.24%

18.01%

+2.23%

NBGNX vs. ODMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBGNX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than ODMAX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBGNX vs. ODMAX - Dividend Comparison

NBGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.90%, less than ODMAX's 34.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
14.90%16.36%2.15%3.03%11.05%10.92%3.84%5.82%12.24%13.89%11.21%18.52%
ODMAX
Invesco Developing Markets Fund
34.60%41.55%0.01%0.53%0.57%5.01%0.00%2.12%0.28%0.30%0.23%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBGNX and ODMAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ODMAX has higher volatility (9.02%) compared to NBGNX (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBGNX dropped -51.75% vs ODMAX's -61.63%.

ODMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBGNX and ODMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer