PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBGNX vs. NMHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBGNX vs. NMHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) and Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBGNX achieves a 5.92% return, which is significantly higher than NMHIX's 0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, NBGNX has outperformed NMHIX with an annualized return of 8.93%, while NMHIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.


NBGNX

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
5.92%
6M
3.69%
1Y
6.96%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
8.93%

NMHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.81%
1Y
5.94%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
2.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBGNX vs. NMHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
5.92%-4.70%9.04%15.57%-19.49%18.07%24.86%29.47%-6.91%15.83%
NMHIX
Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund
0.48%3.56%6.27%4.34%-14.26%4.90%4.04%8.28%2.19%8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between NBGNX and NMHIX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2016

0.02

The correlation between NBGNX and NMHIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.15 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBGNX vs. NMHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBGNX
NBGNX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
NBGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

NMHIX
NMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
NMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBGNX vs. NMHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) and Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBGNXNMHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.48

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

2.20

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.71

8.22

-6.50

NBGNX vs. NMHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBGNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the NMHIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBGNX and NMHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBGNXNMHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

1.97

-1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.04

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.48

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.55

+0.10

Drawdowns

NBGNX vs. NMHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBGNX drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, which is greater than NMHIX's maximum drawdown of -19.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBGNX and NMHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBGNXNMHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.75%

-19.38%

-32.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-2.62%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.51%

-7.29%

-20.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.33%

-19.38%

-8.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.53%

-19.38%

-15.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.78%

-1.64%

-8.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-4.54%

-2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

0.70%

+3.30%

Volatility

NBGNX vs. NMHIX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX) at 1.10%. This indicates that NBGNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBGNXNMHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

1.10%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.33%

2.13%

+9.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.05%

2.93%

+13.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

4.62%

+15.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.22%

4.72%

+15.50%

NBGNX vs. NMHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBGNX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than NMHIX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBGNX vs. NMHIX - Dividend Comparison

NBGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.44%, more than NMHIX's 4.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
15.44%16.36%2.15%3.03%11.05%10.92%3.84%5.82%12.24%13.89%11.21%18.52%
NMHIX
Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund
4.16%3.98%3.81%3.11%2.43%2.74%2.90%3.36%3.64%3.44%4.42%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBGNX and NMHIX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBGNX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to NMHIX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBGNX dropped -51.75% vs NMHIX's -19.38%.

NMHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBGNX and NMHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer