PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBGIX vs. NMHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBGIX vs. NMHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX) and Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBGIX achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly higher than NMHIX's 0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, NBGIX has outperformed NMHIX with an annualized return of 9.17%, while NMHIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.


NBGIX

1D
0.56%
1M
0.47%
YTD
6.58%
6M
4.25%
1Y
7.57%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
9.17%

NMHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.81%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
2.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBGIX vs. NMHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
6.58%-4.55%9.20%15.73%-19.35%18.25%25.07%29.68%-6.76%16.02%
NMHIX
Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund
0.48%3.56%6.27%4.34%-14.26%4.90%4.04%8.28%2.19%8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between NBGIX and NMHIX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2016

0.02

The correlation between NBGIX and NMHIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.15 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBGIX vs. NMHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBGIX
NBGIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
NBGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

NMHIX
NMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
NMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBGIX vs. NMHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX) and Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBGIXNMHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.48

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

2.20

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.30

8.22

-5.91

NBGIX vs. NMHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the NMHIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBGIX and NMHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBGIXNMHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

1.97

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.04

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.48

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.55

-0.01

Drawdowns

NBGIX vs. NMHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBGIX drawdown since its inception was -51.62%, which is greater than NMHIX's maximum drawdown of -19.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBGIX and NMHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBGIXNMHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.62%

-19.38%

-32.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.75%

-2.62%

-8.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.48%

-7.29%

-20.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.27%

-19.38%

-8.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.53%

-19.38%

-15.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.08%

-1.64%

-7.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-4.54%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

0.70%

+3.28%

Volatility

NBGIX vs. NMHIX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX) at 1.10%. This indicates that NBGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBGIXNMHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

1.10%

+2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.31%

2.13%

+9.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.04%

2.93%

+13.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

4.62%

+15.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.23%

4.72%

+15.51%

NBGIX vs. NMHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBGIX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than NMHIX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBGIX vs. NMHIX - Dividend Comparison

NBGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.40%, more than NMHIX's 4.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
15.40%16.41%2.14%3.13%11.11%10.91%3.87%6.00%12.49%14.10%6.53%11.28%
NMHIX
Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund
4.16%3.98%3.81%3.11%2.43%2.74%2.90%3.36%3.64%3.44%4.42%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBGIX and NMHIX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBGIX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to NMHIX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBGIX dropped -51.62% vs NMHIX's -19.38%.

NMHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBGIX and NMHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer