NBCR vs. SIXA
NBCR (Neuberger Core Equity ETF) and SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NBCR returned 17.62% vs 19.26% for SIXA. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NBCR charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for SIXA.
Performance
NBCR vs. SIXA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBCR achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly lower than SIXA's 14.28% return.
NBCR
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- 6M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 1Y
- 17.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIXA
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 1Y
- 19.26%
- 3Y*
- 20.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- —
NBCR vs. SIXA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NBCR Neuberger Core Equity ETF | 7.72% | 18.69% | 6.11% |
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 14.28% | 15.52% | 4.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBCR and SIXA is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | 0.66 |
The correlation between NBCR and SIXA shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBCR vs. SIXA — Risk / Return Rank
NBCR
SIXA
NBCR vs. SIXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Core Equity ETF (NBCR) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBCR | SIXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.36 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 3.25 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.98 | 12.31 | -5.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBCR vs. SIXA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBCR drawdown since its inception was -18.23%, roughly equal to the maximum SIXA drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBCR and SIXA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBCR | SIXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.23% | -18.38% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.35% | -5.59% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.20% | -2.96% | +0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 1.48% | +1.00% |
Volatility
NBCR vs. SIXA - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Core Equity ETF (NBCR) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) at 2.46%. This indicates that NBCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBCR | SIXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 2.46% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.50% | 6.95% | +2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.91% | 8.92% | +2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 12.78% | +3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 13.29% | +3.25% |
NBCR vs. SIXA - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBCR has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXA's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBCR vs. SIXA - Dividend Comparison
NBCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than SIXA's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBCR Neuberger Core Equity ETF | 0.42% | 0.45% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 2.00% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 2.12% | 2.23% | 1.63% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBCR and SIXA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBCR has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to SIXA (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBCR dropped -18.23% vs SIXA's -18.38%.
On 1-year performance, SIXA leads with 19.26% vs 17.62% for NBCR. On fees, NBCR is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SIXA has performed better with a 19.26% return vs 17.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NBCR is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.
SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.42% for NBCR.
They also come from different issuers: Neuberger and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for NBCR and 0.86% for SIXA.
SIXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBCR and SIXA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer