NBCR vs. FJUN
NBCR (Neuberger Core Equity ETF) and FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. NBCR is actively managed, while FJUN is passively managed. Over the past year, NBCR returned 21.22% vs 14.16% for FJUN. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NBCR charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FJUN.
Performance
NBCR vs. FJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBCR achieves a 5.84% return, which is significantly higher than FJUN's 4.84% return.
NBCR
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- 5.84%
- 6M
- 5.14%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FJUN
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- 1Y
- 14.16%
- 3Y*
- 13.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.79%
- 10Y*
- —
NBCR vs. FJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NBCR Neuberger Core Equity ETF | 5.84% | 18.69% | 6.11% |
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 4.84% | 11.05% | 5.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBCR and FJUN is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between NBCR and FJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBCR vs. FJUN — Risk / Return Rank
NBCR
FJUN
NBCR vs. FJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Core Equity ETF (NBCR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBCR | FJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.55 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 3.44 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.70 | 19.85 | -11.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBCR vs. FJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBCR drawdown since its inception was -18.23%, which is greater than FJUN's maximum drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBCR and FJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBCR | FJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.23% | -13.26% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.35% | -4.13% | -6.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -0.17% | -1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -1.66% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 0.72% | +1.73% |
Volatility
NBCR vs. FJUN - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Core Equity ETF (NBCR) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) at 0.44%. This indicates that NBCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBCR | FJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 0.44% | +3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | 4.33% | +5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.93% | 5.61% | +6.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 10.55% | +6.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 10.24% | +6.45% |
NBCR vs. FJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBCR has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBCR vs. FJUN - Dividend Comparison
NBCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NBCR Neuberger Core Equity ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBCR and FJUN have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBCR has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to FJUN (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBCR dropped -18.23% vs FJUN's -13.26%.
On 1-year performance, NBCR leads with 21.22% vs 14.16% for FJUN. On fees, NBCR is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NBCR has performed better with a 21.22% return vs 14.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NBCR is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.
NBCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.
They also come from different issuers: Neuberger and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for NBCR and 0.85% for FJUN.
FJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBCR and FJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer