PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBCM vs. HGER
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NBCM vs. HGER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF (NBCM) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NBCM vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NBCM
Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF
23.89%17.45%6.55%-6.41%5.23%
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
24.94%20.08%9.25%1.93%5.80%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NBCM having a 23.89% return and HGER slightly higher at 24.94%.


NBCM

1D
-0.29%
1M
11.18%
YTD
23.89%
6M
29.39%
1Y
34.41%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
10Y*

HGER

1D
0.16%
1M
9.58%
YTD
24.94%
6M
28.72%
1Y
38.09%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NBCM vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBCM has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NBCM vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBCM
NBCM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NBCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBCM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NBCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBCM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

HGER
HGER Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBCM vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF (NBCM) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBCMHGERDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

2.12

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.38

2.79

-0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

4.51

-1.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.71

15.96

-5.24

NBCM vs. HGER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBCM Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the HGER Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBCM and HGER, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBCMHGERDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.12

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.89

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between NBCM and HGER is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NBCM vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison

NBCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than HGER's 5.67% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
NBCM
Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF
6.83%8.46%5.22%4.37%0.80%
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
5.67%7.09%3.28%7.24%0.64%

Drawdowns

NBCM vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBCM drawdown since its inception was -12.84%, smaller than the maximum HGER drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBCM and HGER.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NBCMHGERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.84%

-23.31%

+10.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

-8.84%

-1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-0.61%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.30%

-7.91%

+3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

2.50%

+0.81%

Volatility

NBCM vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF (NBCM) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) have volatilities of 7.35% and 7.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NBCMHGERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.35%

7.42%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.11%

14.60%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.57%

18.10%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

17.79%

-2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

17.79%

-2.88%