PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBCE vs. CAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBCE vs. CAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE) and Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NBCE

1D
-3.12%
1M
7.62%
YTD
32.09%
6M
32.92%
1Y
68.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CAS

1D
-2.90%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBCE vs. CAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NBCE and CAS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

0.88

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBCE vs. CAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBCE
NBCE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NBCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBCE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
NBCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBCE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

CAS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBCE vs. CAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE) and Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBCECASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.33

NBCE vs. CAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBCE vs. CAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBCE drawdown since its inception was -28.42%, which is greater than CAS's maximum drawdown of -6.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBCE and CAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBCECASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.42%

-6.84%

-21.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

-2.90%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-2.67%

-6.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

Volatility

NBCE vs. CAS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBCECASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.40%

28.91%

-8.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.39%

28.91%

-4.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.39%

28.91%

-4.52%

NBCE vs. CAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBCE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than CAS's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBCE vs. CAS - Dividend Comparison

NBCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while CAS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
CAS
Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
NBCE
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF
1.00%1.32%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBCE and CAS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NBCE is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NBCE is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.

NBCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for CAS.

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for NBCE and 0.88% for CAS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBCE and CAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer