PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAVFX vs. QDSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NAVFX vs. QDSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sector Rotation Fund (NAVFX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAVFX achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly higher than QDSNX's 5.37% return.


NAVFX

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.52%
YTD
7.69%
6M
6.62%
1Y
18.83%
3Y*
18.01%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*
11.37%

QDSNX

1D
0.41%
1M
0.41%
YTD
5.37%
6M
5.59%
1Y
13.75%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAVFX vs. QDSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NAVFX
Sector Rotation Fund
7.69%13.35%21.19%24.55%-17.89%15.78%14.45%
QDSNX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N
5.37%16.14%9.56%8.62%14.48%10.35%5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between NAVFX and QDSNX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2020

0.15

Over the past year, NAVFX and QDSNX have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAVFX vs. QDSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAVFX
NAVFX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NAVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NAVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

QDSNX
QDSNX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QDSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
QDSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAVFX vs. QDSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sector Rotation Fund (NAVFX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NAVFXQDSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.52

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

7.02

-5.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.76

19.08

-9.32

NAVFX vs. QDSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAVFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the QDSNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAVFX and QDSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NAVFX vs. QDSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAVFX drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, which is greater than QDSNX's maximum drawdown of -7.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAVFX and QDSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAVFXQDSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.79%

-7.15%

-23.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-1.97%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.39%

-6.93%

-13.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.30%

-7.15%

-17.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-0.94%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-1.45%

-3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

0.72%

+1.33%

Volatility

NAVFX vs. QDSNX - Volatility Comparison

Sector Rotation Fund (NAVFX) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX) at 1.81%. This indicates that NAVFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAVFXQDSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

1.81%

+3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.88%

3.63%

+7.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

5.08%

+7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

7.62%

+8.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

7.29%

+9.33%

NAVFX vs. QDSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAVFX has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is lower than QDSNX's 3.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

NAVFX vs. QDSNX - Dividend Comparison

NAVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than QDSNX's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NAVFX
Sector Rotation Fund
2.05%2.21%7.02%1.66%7.80%5.16%1.16%8.54%10.05%6.08%2.96%3.14%
QDSNX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N
1.89%1.99%0.00%11.18%8.01%5.99%1.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NAVFX and QDSNX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NAVFX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to QDSNX (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAVFX dropped -30.79% vs QDSNX's -7.15%.

QDSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAVFX and QDSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer