PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAUG vs. JANB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NAUG vs. JANB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF (NAUG) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAUG achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly higher than JANB's 5.19% return.


NAUG

1D
0.24%
1M
0.19%
YTD
6.54%
6M
6.18%
1Y
15.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JANB

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
5.19%
6M
5.00%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAUG vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NAUG
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF
6.54%2.14%
JANB
Aptus January Buffer ETF
5.19%2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between NAUG and JANB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAUG vs. JANB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAUG
NAUG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

JANB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAUG vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF (NAUG) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NAUGJANBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.90

NAUG vs. JANB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NAUG vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAUG drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, which is greater than JANB's maximum drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAUG and JANB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAUGJANBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-6.52%

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-1.10%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-1.10%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

Volatility

NAUG vs. JANB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAUGJANBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.22%

7.47%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.12%

7.47%

+3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.12%

7.47%

+3.65%

NAUG vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAUG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

NAUG vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison

Neither NAUG nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NAUG and JANB have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NAUG.

NAUG and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NAUG and 0.25% for JANB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAUG and JANB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer