NATP.L vs. IUVF.L
NATP.L (HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP) and IUVF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS) are both exchange-traded funds - NATP.L is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the EQM Future of Defence Index, while IUVF.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NATP.L returned 36.04%/yr vs 28.84%/yr for IUVF.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NATP.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IUVF.L.
Performance
NATP.L vs. IUVF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NATP.L achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly lower than IUVF.L's 42.65% return.
NATP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- 6M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 1Y
- 14.78%
- 3Y*
- 36.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUVF.L
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- 6M
- 37.31%
- YTD
- 42.65%
- 1Y
- 73.51%
- 3Y*
- 28.84%
- 5Y*
- 16.72%
- 10Y*
- —
NATP.L vs. IUVF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NATP.L HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP | 10.71% | 43.73% | 34.66% | 15.24% |
IUVF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS | 42.65% | 23.92% | 8.23% | 8.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between NATP.L and IUVF.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2023 | 0.41 |
The correlation between NATP.L and IUVF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NATP.L vs. IUVF.L — Risk / Return Rank
NATP.L
IUVF.L
NATP.L vs. IUVF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP (NATP.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NATP.L | IUVF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.74 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 9.22 | -8.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | 37.21 | -36.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NATP.L vs. IUVF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NATP.L drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, roughly equal to the maximum IUVF.L drawdown of -31.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NATP.L and IUVF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NATP.L | IUVF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.07% | -31.83% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.07% | -7.93% | -24.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.07% | -20.13% | -11.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.08% | -6.04% | -16.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -5.50% | -1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.13% | 1.97% | +19.16% |
Volatility
NATP.L vs. IUVF.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP (NATP.L) is 7.07%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L) has a volatility of 7.63%. This indicates that NATP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUVF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NATP.L | IUVF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 7.63% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.92% | 14.81% | +1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.67% | 17.32% | +29.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.32% | 16.36% | +13.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.32% | 18.05% | +12.27% |
NATP.L vs. IUVF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NATP.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IUVF.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
NATP.L vs. IUVF.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither NATP.L nor IUVF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NATP.L and IUVF.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUVF.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUVF.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NATP.L.
NATP.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while IUVF.L is Large Cap Value Equities. NATP.L tracks EQM Future of Defence Index, while IUVF.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NATP.L and 0.20% for IUVF.L.
Find the right allocation for NATP.L and IUVF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer