NATP.L vs. ESGP.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP (NATP.L) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L).

NATP.L and ESGP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NATP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the EQM Future of Defence Index. It was launched on Jun 30, 2023. ESGP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. It was launched on Jul 2, 2021. Both NATP.L and ESGP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

NATP.L vs. ESGP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP (NATP.L) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NATP.L vs. ESGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NATP.L HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP	4.07%	43.73%	34.66%	15.89%
ESGP.L HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF	7.18%	136.71%	3.17%	3.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NATP.L achieves a 4.07% return, which is significantly lower than ESGP.L's 7.18% return.

NATP.L

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: -2.66%
• YTD: 4.07%
• 6M: -1.74%
• 1Y: 30.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ESGP.L

• 1D: 2.36%
• 1M: -20.65%
• YTD: 7.18%
• 6M: 16.16%
• 1Y: 95.45%
• 3Y*: 34.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NATP.L vs. ESGP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NATP.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGP.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

ESGP.L

HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF

NATP.L

HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP

Return for Risk

NATP.L vs. ESGP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NATP.L

NATP.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
NATP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
NATP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
NATP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
NATP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
NATP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 64

ESGP.L

ESGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 91
ESGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ESGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
ESGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ESGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ESGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NATP.L vs. ESGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP (NATP.L) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NATP.L	ESGP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	2.39	-0.96
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	2.69	-0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.37	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	3.29	-0.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.20	11.73	-5.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NATP.L vs. ESGP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NATP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the ESGP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NATP.L and ESGP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NATP.L	ESGP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	2.39	-0.96
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.01	0.68	+1.34

Correlation

The correlation between NATP.L and ESGP.L is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NATP.L vs. ESGP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NATP.L nor ESGP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NATP.L vs. ESGP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NATP.L drawdown since its inception was -11.66%, smaller than the maximum ESGP.L drawdown of -36.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NATP.L and ESGP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	NATP.L	ESGP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.66%	-36.54%	+24.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.55%	-28.67%	+17.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.46%	-20.65%	+12.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.15%	-13.27%	+11.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.52%	8.04%	-3.52%

Volatility

NATP.L vs. ESGP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP (NATP.L) is 5.82%, while HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L) has a volatility of 16.03%. This indicates that NATP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NATP.L	ESGP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.82%	16.03%	-10.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.62%	33.32%	-18.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.97%	39.64%	-18.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.09%	32.63%	-14.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.09%	32.63%	-14.54%