PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NATO vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NATO vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NATO vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NATO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
0.78%50.95%0.35%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
6.46%49.17%-5.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NATO achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 6.46% return.


NATO

1D
3.75%
1M
-11.24%
YTD
0.78%
6M
-1.05%
1Y
34.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMH

1D
5.76%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
6.46%
6M
17.84%
1Y
81.87%
3Y*
43.47%
5Y*
25.59%
10Y*
31.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NATO vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NATO and SMH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Return for Risk

NATO vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NATO
NATO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
NATO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NATO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NATO vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NATOSMHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.53

2.23

-0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

2.85

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

5.10

-2.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.09

18.29

-10.21

NATO vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NATO Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NATO and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NATOSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

2.23

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.56

0.28

+1.28

Correlation

The correlation between NATO and SMH is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NATO vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

NATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than SMH's 0.29% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NATO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
0.45%0.45%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.29%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Drawdowns

NATO vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NATO drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NATO and SMH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NATOSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.99%

-84.96%

+68.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.99%

-15.95%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.83%

-10.03%

-2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-41.36%

+38.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

4.44%

-0.18%

Volatility

NATO vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) is 8.45%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 12.11%. This indicates that NATO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NATOSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.45%

12.11%

-3.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.04%

23.95%

-8.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.63%

36.84%

-14.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.75%

34.71%

-12.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.75%

32.28%

-10.53%