NATO.L vs. ARKQ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

NATO.L (HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating) and ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NATO.L is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the EQM Future of Defence Index, while ARKQ is a Robotics fund actively managed by ARK. NATO.L is passively managed, while ARKQ is actively managed. Over the past year, NATO.L returned 17.19% vs 55.23% for ARKQ. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NATO.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKQ.

Performance

NATO.L vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NATO.L achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly lower than ARKQ's 12.86% return.

NATO.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.24%
• YTD: 10.38%
• 6M: 11.03%
• 1Y: 17.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARKQ

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -5.27%
• YTD: 12.86%
• 6M: 13.25%
• 1Y: 55.23%
• 3Y*: 32.57%
• 5Y*: 9.89%
• 10Y*: 21.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NATO.L vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NATO.L HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating	10.38%	54.83%	31.99%	16.64%
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	12.86%	48.81%	33.88%	2.38%

Correlation

The correlation between NATO.L and ARKQ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2023	0.47

The correlation between NATO.L and ARKQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NATO.L vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NATO.L

NATO.L Risk / Return Rank: 27
NATO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
NATO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
NATO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 25
NATO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
NATO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

ARKQ

ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 54
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 48
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NATO.L vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NATO.L	ARKQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	1.66	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	2.18	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.27	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	2.70	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.23	7.95	-4.72

NATO.L vs. ARKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NATO.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the ARKQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NATO.L and ARKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NATO.L vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NATO.L drawdown since its inception was -12.87%, smaller than the maximum ARKQ drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NATO.L and ARKQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NATO.L	ARKQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.87%	-59.89%	+47.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.79%	-20.58%	+7.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.71%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.45%	-10.02%	+5.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.59%	-17.22%	+14.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.31%	6.97%	-1.66%

Volatility

NATO.L vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) is 7.02%, while ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a volatility of 12.70%. This indicates that NATO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NATO.L	ARKQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.02%	12.70%	-5.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.02%	26.15%	-10.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.17%	33.54%	-13.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.14%	32.50%	-13.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.14%	29.98%	-10.84%

NATO.L vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NATO.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NATO.L vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison

NATO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	0.24%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.80%	0.86%	0.00%	2.86%	1.54%	0.00%	0.98%
NATO.L HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NATO.L and ARKQ in my portfolio?

NATO.L and ARKQ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NATO.L or ARKQ?

On fees, NATO.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NATO.L or ARKQ?

NATO.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.

What is the main difference between NATO.L and ARKQ?

NATO.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while ARKQ is Robotics. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NATO.L and 0.75% for ARKQ.