NASD.L vs. TRFK

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NASD.L (Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD) and TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NASD.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NASD.L returned 28.20%/yr vs 52.66%/yr for TRFK. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NASD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TRFK.

Performance

NASD.L vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NASD.L achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly lower than TRFK's 64.96% return.

NASD.L

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 8.56%
• YTD: 19.73%
• 6M: 19.19%
• 1Y: 40.49%
• 3Y*: 28.20%
• 5Y*: 17.79%
• 10Y*: —

TRFK

• 1D: -2.93%
• 1M: 24.68%
• YTD: 64.96%
• 6M: 57.34%
• 1Y: 97.75%
• 3Y*: 52.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NASD.L vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NASD.L Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD	19.73%	19.87%	26.82%	56.40%	-13.14%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	64.96%	26.81%	38.30%	66.63%	-10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between NASD.L and TRFK is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2022	0.62

The correlation between NASD.L and TRFK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

NASD.L vs. TRFK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NASD.L	TRFK
Technology	53.7%	91.8%
Communication Services	15.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	-
Healthcare	4.2%	-
Industrials	3.1%	8.3%
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	-
Energy	0.6%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

NASD.L vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NASD.L

NASD.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
NASD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
NASD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
NASD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
NASD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
NASD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

TRFK

TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 85
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 86
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NASD.L vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NASD.L	TRFK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	3.53	-0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	4.15	-0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.52	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.69	5.03	-1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.29	12.06	+1.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NASD.L vs. TRFK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NASD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the TRFK Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NASD.L and TRFK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NASD.L	TRFK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.55	3.53	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	1.54	-0.57

Drawdowns

NASD.L vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NASD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.01%, which is greater than TRFK's maximum drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASD.L and TRFK.

Drawdown Indicators

	NASD.L	TRFK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.01%	-29.06%	-5.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.93%	-19.56%	+8.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.36%	-29.06%	+6.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-2.99%	+2.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.28%	-6.04%	-1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	8.13%	-5.09%

Volatility

NASD.L vs. TRFK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) is 4.92%, while Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a volatility of 10.70%. This indicates that NASD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRFK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NASD.L	TRFK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.92%	10.70%	-5.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.69%	21.98%	-10.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.83%	27.82%	-11.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.79%	28.94%	-8.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.24%	28.94%	-7.70%

NASD.L vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison

NASD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TRFK's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

NASD.L vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison

NASD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NASD.L Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.66%	0.70%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.40%	0.20%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NASD.L and TRFK in my portfolio?

NASD.L and TRFK have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NASD.L or TRFK?

On fees, NASD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NASD.L or TRFK?

NASD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TRFK.

What is the main difference between NASD.L and TRFK?

NASD.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while TRFK is Technology Equities. NASD.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NASD.L and 0.60% for TRFK.