PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NASD.L vs. QQQO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

NASD.L vs. QQQO.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NASD.L (Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD) and QQQO.L (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. NASD.L is passively managed, while QQQO.L is actively managed. Over the past year, NASD.L returned 40.49% vs 32.05% for QQQO.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NASD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQQO.L.

Performance

NASD.L vs. QQQO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NASD.L is traded in USD, while QQQO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QQQO.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NASD.L achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly higher than QQQO.L's 15.24% return.

NASD.L

1D
-0.74%
1M
8.56%
YTD
19.73%
6M
19.19%
1Y
40.49%
3Y*
28.20%
5Y*
17.79%
10Y*
—

QQQO.L

1D
-0.61%
1M
5.94%
YTD
15.24%
6M
15.34%
1Y
32.05%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NASD.L vs. QQQO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
NASD.L
Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD		19.73%19.87%10.53%
QQQO.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP		15.24%14.61%7.07%

Correlation

The correlation between NASD.L and QQQO.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024

0.63

The correlation between NASD.L and QQQO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD

IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP

Often compared with NASD.L:
NASD.L vs. AAPLNASD.L vs. TSLANASD.L vs. AIAI.LNASD.L vs. MWRD.LNASD.L vs. SUSW.LNASD.L vs. METANASD.L vs. NVDA
Often compared with QQQO.L:
QQQO.L vs. SPMOQQQO.L vs. QQQQQQO.L vs. QTUMQQQO.L vs. QQQMQQQO.L vs. EQQQ.LQQQO.L vs. TSLI.LQQQO.L vs. QQQI

Return for Risk

NASD.L vs. QQQO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NASD.L
NASD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NASD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NASD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
QQQO.L
QQQO.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NASD.L vs. QQQO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

NASD.LQQQO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.55
2.30

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.50
3.02

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

4.24

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

12.87

+0.42

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NASD.L vs. QQQO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NASD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the QQQO.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NASD.L and QQQO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

NASD.LQQQO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.30

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

1.28

-0.31

Drawdowns

NASD.L vs. QQQO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NASD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.01%, which is greater than QQQO.L's maximum drawdown of -18.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASD.L and QQQO.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

NASD.LQQQO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.01%

-18.52%

-16.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-7.52%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.01%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.73%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.28%

-2.96%

-4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.48%

+0.56%

Volatility

NASD.L vs. QQQO.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) at 3.88%. This indicates that NASD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

NASD.LQQQO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

3.88%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

9.33%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

13.86%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.79%

16.88%

+3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.24%

16.88%

+4.36%

NASD.L vs. QQQO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NASD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQO.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

NASD.L vs. QQQO.L - Dividend Comparison

NASD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.52%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NASD.L
Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.66%0.70%
QQQO.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP		67.52%124.53%17.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

NASD.L and QQQO.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NASD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NASD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQQO.L.

They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NASD.L and 0.45% for QQQO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NASD.L and QQQO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer