NASD.L vs. IBB1.DE
NASD.L (Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD) and IBB1.DE (iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - NASD.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while IBB1.DE is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NASD.L returned 16.10%/yr vs -3.81%/yr for IBB1.DE. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NASD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBB1.DE.
Performance
NASD.L vs. IBB1.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NASD.L is traded in USD, while IBB1.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IBB1.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NASD.L achieves a 16.24% return, which is significantly higher than IBB1.DE's -4.26% return.
NASD.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 16.24%
- 6M
- 15.51%
- 1Y
- 33.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.10%
- 10Y*
- 23.15%
IBB1.DE
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -4.26%
- 6M
- -4.39%
- 1Y
- -1.20%
- 3Y*
- 2.34%
- 5Y*
- -3.81%
- 10Y*
- —
NASD.L vs. IBB1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NASD.L Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD | 16.24% | 19.86% | 26.83% | 56.40% | -33.39% | 28.25% | 48.47% | 22.87% |
IBB1.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist | -4.26% | 20.04% | -8.06% | 4.41% | -21.47% | -11.55% | 19.02% | 3.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASD.L and IBB1.DE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2019 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NASD.L vs. IBB1.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NASD.L
IBB1.DE
NASD.L vs. IBB1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (IBB1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NASD.L | IBB1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.99 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | -0.12 | +3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.64 | -0.28 | +10.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NASD.L vs. IBB1.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASD.L drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, which is greater than IBB1.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASD.L and IBB1.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NASD.L | IBB1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.96% | -38.59% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.93% | -6.71% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.36% | -14.66% | -7.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.01% | -35.45% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.63% | -23.38% | +19.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.41% | -18.06% | +10.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.82% | +0.32% |
Volatility
NASD.L vs. IBB1.DE - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (IBB1.DE) at 2.55%. This indicates that NASD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBB1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NASD.L | IBB1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 2.55% | +4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.17% | 6.56% | +6.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.86% | 9.04% | +7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 11.95% | +9.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 11.21% | +10.41% |
NASD.L vs. IBB1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NASD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IBB1.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
NASD.L vs. IBB1.DE - Dividend Comparison
NASD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBB1.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBB1.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist | 4.32% | 4.12% | 3.98% | 3.06% | 2.05% | 1.15% | 1.56% | 1.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NASD.L Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.69% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NASD.L and IBB1.DE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBB1.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBB1.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NASD.L.
NASD.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IBB1.DE is Intermediate Core Bond. NASD.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while IBB1.DE tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NASD.L and 0.10% for IBB1.DE.
Find the right allocation for NASD.L and IBB1.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer