PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NASD.L vs. CNX1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

NASD.L vs. CNX1.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NASD.L (Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD) and CNX1.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from Amundi and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NASD.L returned 17.79%/yr vs 17.58%/yr for CNX1.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NASD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for CNX1.L.

Performance

NASD.L vs. CNX1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NASD.L is traded in USD, while CNX1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CNX1.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NASD.L having a 19.73% return and CNX1.L slightly lower at 19.55%.

NASD.L

1D
-0.74%
1M
8.56%
YTD
19.73%
6M
19.19%
1Y
40.49%
3Y*
28.20%
5Y*
17.79%
10Y*
—

CNX1.L

1D
-0.58%
1M
8.70%
YTD
19.55%
6M
19.30%
1Y
40.34%
3Y*
27.90%
5Y*
17.58%
10Y*
21.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NASD.L vs. CNX1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NASD.L
Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD		19.73%19.87%26.82%56.40%-33.39%28.25%48.47%38.09%-8.81%
CNX1.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		19.55%19.98%26.37%55.50%-33.49%28.32%47.63%38.99%-8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between NASD.L and CNX1.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018

0.96

The correlation between NASD.L and CNX1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

NASD.L vs. CNX1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
NASD.L
CNX1.L

Technology

53.7%
57.3%

Communication Services

15.8%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
6.9%

Healthcare

4.2%
3.8%

Industrials

3.1%
2.8%

Utilities

1.4%
1.3%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.1%

Energy

0.6%
0.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Technology

NASD.L
53.7%
CNX1.L
57.3%

Communication Services

NASD.L
15.8%
CNX1.L
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

NASD.L
12.2%
CNX1.L
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

NASD.L
7.7%
CNX1.L
6.9%

Healthcare

NASD.L
4.2%
CNX1.L
3.8%

Industrials

NASD.L
3.1%
CNX1.L
2.8%

Utilities

NASD.L
1.4%
CNX1.L
1.3%

Basic Materials

NASD.L
1.1%
CNX1.L
1.1%

Energy

NASD.L
0.6%
CNX1.L
0.5%

Financial Services

NASD.L
0.2%
CNX1.L
0.2%

Real Estate

NASD.L
0.1%
CNX1.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with NASD.L:
NASD.L vs. AAPLNASD.L vs. TSLANASD.L vs. AIAI.LNASD.L vs. MWRD.LNASD.L vs. SUSW.LNASD.L vs. METANASD.L vs. NVDA
Often compared with CNX1.L:
CNX1.L vs. CNDX.LCNX1.L vs. EQQQ.LCNX1.L vs. IITU.LCNX1.L vs. EQGB.LCNX1.L vs. QQQCNX1.L vs. XNAQ.LCNX1.L vs. SXRV.DE

Return for Risk

NASD.L vs. CNX1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NASD.L
NASD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NASD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NASD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
CNX1.L
CNX1.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NASD.L vs. CNX1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

NASD.LCNX1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.55
2.61

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.50
3.59

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

3.65

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

13.38

-0.09

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NASD.L vs. CNX1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NASD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NASD.L and CNX1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

NASD.LCNX1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.61

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.86

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

1.09

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

1.07

-0.09

Drawdowns

NASD.L vs. CNX1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NASD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.01%, roughly equal to the maximum CNX1.L drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASD.L and CNX1.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

NASD.LCNX1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.01%

-35.21%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-10.99%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

-23.11%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.01%

-35.21%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.21%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.77%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.28%

-5.19%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.01%

+0.03%

Volatility

NASD.L vs. CNX1.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) at 4.33%. This indicates that NASD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNX1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

NASD.LCNX1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

4.33%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

11.28%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

15.39%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.79%

20.48%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.24%

19.91%

+1.33%

NASD.L vs. CNX1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NASD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CNX1.L's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

NASD.L vs. CNX1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NASD.L nor CNX1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CNX1.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NASD.L
Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.66%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.96, NASD.L and CNX1.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, NASD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NASD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for CNX1.L.

Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NASD.L and 0.36% for CNX1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NASD.L and CNX1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer