PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NASD.L vs. ARKK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NASD.L vs. ARKK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) and ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NASD.L achieves a 16.24% return, which is significantly higher than ARKK's -0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, NASD.L has outperformed ARKK with an annualized return of 23.15%, while ARKK has yielded a comparatively lower 15.90% annualized return.


NASD.L

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
16.24%
6M
15.51%
1Y
33.55%
3Y*
26.32%
5Y*
16.10%
10Y*
23.15%

ARKK

1D
0.05%
1M
0.42%
YTD
-0.26%
6M
-4.87%
1Y
9.13%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
-9.12%
10Y*
15.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NASD.L vs. ARKK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NASD.L
Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD
16.24%19.86%26.83%56.40%-33.39%28.25%48.47%58.31%4.62%16.51%
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF
-0.26%35.49%8.40%69.04%-66.97%-23.60%152.71%35.08%3.52%87.33%

Correlation

The correlation between NASD.L and ARKK is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2014

0.51

The correlation between NASD.L and ARKK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

NASD.L vs. ARKK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NASD.L
ARKK

Technology

53.7%
25.9%

Communication Services

15.8%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Healthcare

4.2%
28.1%

Industrials

3.1%
5.7%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%
16.2%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

NASD.L
53.7%
ARKK
25.9%

Communication Services

NASD.L
15.8%
ARKK
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

NASD.L
12.2%
ARKK
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

NASD.L
7.7%
ARKK

-

Healthcare

NASD.L
4.2%
ARKK
28.1%

Industrials

NASD.L
3.1%
ARKK
5.7%

Utilities

NASD.L
1.4%
ARKK

-

Basic Materials

NASD.L
1.1%
ARKK

-

Energy

NASD.L
0.6%
ARKK

-

Financial Services

NASD.L
0.2%
ARKK
16.2%

Real Estate

NASD.L
0.1%
ARKK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NASD.L vs. ARKK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NASD.L
NASD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NASD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NASD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKK
ARKK Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ARKK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKK Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKK Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NASD.L vs. ARKK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) and ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NASD.LARKKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.07

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

0.29

+2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.64

0.63

+10.02

NASD.L vs. ARKK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NASD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the ARKK Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NASD.L and ARKK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NASD.L vs. ARKK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NASD.L drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, smaller than the maximum ARKK drawdown of -80.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASD.L and ARKK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NASD.LARKKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.96%

-80.97%

+39.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-31.35%

+20.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

-39.56%

+17.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.01%

-77.23%

+42.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.01%

-80.97%

+45.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.63%

-50.32%

+46.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.41%

-30.20%

+22.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

14.61%

-11.47%

Volatility

NASD.L vs. ARKK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) is 6.73%, while ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that NASD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NASD.LARKKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

12.53%

-5.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.17%

26.63%

-13.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

36.17%

-19.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.64%

46.46%

-24.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.62%

40.39%

-18.77%

NASD.L vs. ARKK - Expense Ratio Comparison

NASD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKK's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

NASD.L vs. ARKK - Dividend Comparison

Neither NASD.L nor ARKK has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.70%0.00%0.55%1.64%0.38%3.14%1.32%0.00%2.27%
NASD.L
Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.66%0.69%0.87%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NASD.L and ARKK have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NASD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NASD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKK.

NASD.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ARKK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NASD.L and 0.75% for ARKK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NASD.L and ARKK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer